From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B4F640DB49 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2026 23:55:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789689358; cv=none; b=m759j4QYkFbqDtEYhIWs2SCTfOZlqOmWPZ+AspeITKs75aPs49Z6xi+ONUxdNSMAB19zVKb4CCF1dy7TDRHsCn3+ZTPK/HX0VsvlZ+0kGz0BVuYSRwvbXQkNmtBHAIV4Uyv/PjJFI0LYdRdScspOgwzdUOhysND++E6vxsi/yr8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789689358; c=relaxed/simple; bh=lvK2WI8nafCy3bHDAdhKq91n4ESlH5SXkHx10pAJ4t0=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=nmNcwcLIN6PDcJvohU+vwkm3t75Ttq0QKjZDD7VW8zsYF58QyRKtHydb00XxpBtHxrfd8/TXln0Y6nA9KSxsmj+Ttc7x+A0EzGW0N5geJsQMN/lBkaRfQT/wY9jQVta0s4g4zEUJ++M5lWDGI53mN8Zeidd422rcliFdEf1F7HA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=lbW5a0on; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="lbW5a0on" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D0DAC1F000FF; Thu, 17 Sep 2026 23:55:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789689357; bh=nIrIngBJ14U2WOMWBWP46Wt51vCtyl8OIskODPZ0tLw=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=lbW5a0onRFZYEQKtNNpjn5xunFyTOv1kQ5P0A/QVkh0aMQlwFML2QRobF4hZDx5Yw lHFIv9wmtmKB2VMjYyYfqnYWIgQn6hGMNylqVp0bghVlAAqnj3UXgPYqxRcX+9T1pL Bx7uIRFrzuX2fU8IlBlLJwmNUdtq2virgwBv6r8bZu3xhK8nlezhFwGgr0eE/h/HTC aG8aIM6h5Ylw/0rQ/dFyBMktmwQRteBflwO0msTM3LOg44RUW6972mg+1YpD9KhCz2 FDTIBbnMuMrX4MTu3Qv7T/LUsuAwygpmXJTSnS2raXYjQeCSwfy5Tv1zyAuNvtkTwQ xCtbaVyge9auw== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 09/13] mips: Use the common syscall table Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: =?utf-8?b?QW5kcsOpIEFsbWVpZGE=?= Cc: "Alexander Gordeev" , "Heiko Carstens" , "Christian Borntraeger" , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Vasily Gorbik" In-Reply-To: <20260917-tonyk-syscall_table-v7-9-f4cd8f8e3265@igalia.com> References: <20260917-tonyk-syscall_table-v7-0-f4cd8f8e3265@igalia.com> <20260917-tonyk-syscall_table-v7-9-f4cd8f8e3265@igalia.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 23:55:56 +0000 Message-Id: <20260917235556.D0DAC1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > Syscall numbers from 403 are shared with all architectures, so move the > toolchain to use the common syscall table and remove duplicated code. >=20 > To help with that, merge n32 and n64 syscall tables in a single one, taki= ng > advantage of the shared numbers. >=20 > The generated files are not exactly the same as before, but they have no > functional changes: >=20 > - For O32 ABI, the syscall table would have entries like > __SYSCALL_WITH_COMPAT(403, sys_clock_gettime, sys_clock_gettime) > which is equivalent to the new entry __SYSCALL(403, sys_clock_gettime) >=20 > - For N32 ABI, the syscall table would have entries like > __SYSCALL(413, compat_sys_pselect6_time64), which is equivalent to > __SYSCALL_WITH_COMPAT(413, sys_pselect6, compat_sys_pselect6_time64) > given the new __SYSCALL_WITH_COMPAT() definition for N32. >=20 > - The above applies for N64 ABI as well. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Andr=C3=A9 Almeida Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260917-tonyk-sysc= all_table-v7-0-f4cd8f8e3265@igalia.com?part=3D9