From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E3CC2DF126 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2026 00:45:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789778710; cv=none; b=qc/x67O837rdI65K0XmIE2/khSyp4kCg6MU104kH+h/uCfRDbuIfQwfJl/cYcrzLwH3m6493enf8rPgcpZ7Cn9Pmib8oov2IXJHTO9cgMV8Xh7QwbCu5UdaDPFVzgnW1EB9iX+vpBR23+SNESaxcJOacw3hH1smZlCkBHyWUrl8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789778710; c=relaxed/simple; bh=OBEjqhzw76l/37VYzw6iXRo7RVt0pJoGvJPPi5d0Aas=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=jzv+ryKgaj9BFRxUf5QA39HHwXEtffklkP6sFGKo+QSS7HUxpL7P5Lk1D6ym/4mPRNQiwQKXbEan6mmg0kKbnhJRyupOmQeWiEH44n2V4Ubw07J3GYTRLtZBoHId1EECC2hPE23CHbL/p7cl/Iu0k6caJ9VPvdREhF+ILqoB8is= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Ktjo8ABC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Ktjo8ABC" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BA42E1F000FF; Sat, 19 Sep 2026 00:45:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789778709; bh=EnNDgoDeFvPfXi1b9SBc2eaMUE95pMA3CLKlyIE+cMU=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=Ktjo8ABCC03Rscd5oKmrF03dSXgcaZi0CI34nf++55D79Y1KGh48GYYjQP6eAYCWf hhpbp84EzuA2MXo+PYDHKhPFTHab8z0pUut4wbVvaOF4BTeJWz+h0nJES4d4fHo+HL 00Qhgy3f7/anmiLyIhr7BAWNI71w53h4VwC3M82o3WnUkjy7PfKqtJ2oyAOaCAxN5y EpAFG7xkdoXEctFTVKcTXQE7fXlOAYAhhFWetvUoEjkgrWYeNKYksoycclrhi+xUb0 WrC2XPoBVq0s0yvHbWaO9cAf3vq0A94CpRMatzOuyExP+Jy1DTOnw7FTyhF559h7Ot s8gBsMS54w2zQ== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 05/12] sparc: Use the common syscall table Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: =?utf-8?b?QW5kcsOpIEFsbWVpZGE=?= Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Carstens" , "Vasily Gorbik" , "Alexander Gordeev" , "Christian Borntraeger" In-Reply-To: <20260918-tonyk-syscall_table-v8-5-0e2d60cad13e@igalia.com> References: <20260918-tonyk-syscall_table-v8-0-0e2d60cad13e@igalia.com> <20260918-tonyk-syscall_table-v8-5-0e2d60cad13e@igalia.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2026 00:45:08 +0000 Message-Id: <20260919004508.BA42E1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > Remove some of the duplicated code by using the common syscall number > table. >=20 > The generated files are not exactly the same as before, but they have no > functional changes: >=20 > - syscall_table_32.h would generated lines like the following > __SYSCALL_WITH_COMPAT(422, sys_futex, sys_futex), which is equivalent = to > __SYSCALL(422, sys_futex) >=20 > Signed-off-by: Andr=C3=A9 Almeida Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260918-tonyk-sysc= all_table-v8-0-0e2d60cad13e@igalia.com?part=3D5