From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1924F320A37 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2026 13:14:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789823690; cv=none; b=a7Tb1MmUpIj2mC+CceWaiooo5YBymQNP3lLNGmmhGwGN2WgMt8xqgqfpSpGiu9kSDgdiLvDXtixnUYJquLPbb7YAtusO7Q0BG5GB8Fi9taZ5xfwuskOQqS0cM1dUTDb8BpDO8ZIx8abAzmOO8WiJFHqa4DPtCpmqLCYPOwnc7p0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789823690; c=relaxed/simple; bh=BgHH+xfi6n/lAF5HbOe7dXII88a00nrxWHtiQvDwrwE=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=RsQCl1wZfElhJPauw1rp09pNhjrJW/rn0RYPTe9Mxi5F5vYcCJiVYosyr5y92FOuS3E3oHoGngKqAJGD3EI7eqZmneWjNuo+vByqH85QbPK73xr55GTBeD7Saax+5cExwSP6lAQTaHtfFr8wsXiBgtyudmSyr6h7pYQBMY6rjOY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=WLAszxBc; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="WLAszxBc" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3E2771F000FF; Sat, 19 Sep 2026 13:14:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789823688; bh=BgHH+xfi6n/lAF5HbOe7dXII88a00nrxWHtiQvDwrwE=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=WLAszxBcGVg+5ufn7+loy68Oy/bZF2TIwFM6qm7nKItck1fohb/sxJy3pj49Nh/sg hzleN9XnDTixBYiBXd30/zGtOZfWhduLzIc3SbNtbwfJZcvdHvG41YKLRUnxTIhoL8 6tRwLWgMRG7etHzqJruqE8kXajjyM4mapTgaKMUCBZZjk/Q2Z3SWgsGTGu4k9ExxR9 KIaiT4ENLUsdqG0zkRfCM+5AMPI/AV+yqvSK14E7nxeL71FFj1IrLmgxFatvQoxoNe UB0KzNzNV4evOwyYfjiVWqWBJiiVtLqLp5bQAmhToZysiq/kgiR8qb4vs50GSUCcOI awUNQtjUyuUgA== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390/cio: use assign_bit() where applicable Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: =?utf-8?b?UGVuZyBGYW4gKE9TUyk=?= Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Vasily Gorbik" , "Heiko Carstens" , "Alexander Gordeev" , "Christian Borntraeger" In-Reply-To: <20260919130844.3041591-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com> References: <20260919130844.3041591-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2026 13:14:47 +0000 Message-Id: <20260919131448.3E2771F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > From: Peng Fan >=20 > Convert open-coded if/else with set_bit/clear_bit to the assign_bit API. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260919130844.3041= 591-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com?part=3D1