From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 101B53C3442 for ; Sun, 20 Sep 2026 02:34:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789871642; cv=none; b=DXwxznXjbilyJsD31OU0Y3m815LK5aB/tth4Tvb8/3STA8X1Hl0ySK6vZb/dpLnR/iWmGj7gkWWAwBvGdTLP7/zEKG3sAvbwl41po0IFAcAu72zHNXu1AmGI5/mQp9O5U9e257d2ZfRxtRl1iGfwUFXH5CKjgDNWU5t5bCBxgP8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789871642; c=relaxed/simple; bh=kFJyNEyMw6lRwE/OvLOM4ZtMe2jqGuukJ3SKdez/kqk=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=BkIMzbS04ISdRBPQeRklJBIUrXGE4vA3+BBbfzBqsvUPIF+L9mslW8Z1FAt45C/fzosUOSkeNA/95HXfXL/olS7rmki/QWDVW8dCRPmaRHjx2XIJ2RMvkPq4l3V0waSm8iC54/fFnOkGnl3bqcz43mLk3NrX0cc1zPC/xmF7zMU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=AdTegspL; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="AdTegspL" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 600E91F000FF; Sun, 20 Sep 2026 02:34:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789871640; bh=kFJyNEyMw6lRwE/OvLOM4ZtMe2jqGuukJ3SKdez/kqk=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=AdTegspL5BnGP1/RrpvqVailWvwx+v3Ns73yi3VNfnMmvDEvqfq6ORbL70rhNWD7j lKWuJEOcGPpsc1r5hekXlFcqlskSTGxIbgp1KhifQaB1gOl4oPEXdLlu6EK9GxXp3i hGMBNDOyX/NGcGXEKnK485943iI6cpFaxHSwGIL2aWKhCn2dz4f7vkE49BckTeacNW AEHibOjABFLXErgKiST5MALUGwvmIZisqg7sXEtk2HHeo/C5ASPKlK+Siozv7si6gq c3TSGhZ49fH1X5sajkXba9wIR1NxSf4B4HBOI9tjbaiJFdhDYXRMTW9kl+XGBcz685 E7kgfGOXFVO3w== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390/time: use assign_bit() where applicable Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: =?utf-8?b?UGVuZyBGYW4gKE9TUyk=?= Cc: "Christian Borntraeger" , "Vasily Gorbik" , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Carstens" , "Alexander Gordeev" In-Reply-To: <20260920022804.3145894-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com> References: <20260920022804.3145894-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2026 02:33:59 +0000 Message-Id: <20260920023400.600E91F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > From: Peng Fan >=20 > Convert open-coded if/else with set_bit/clear_bit to the assign_bit API. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260920022804.3145= 894-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com?part=3D1