From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35C91457E43 for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2026 08:46:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789980382; cv=none; b=H3aSBwbsJS++8cD5KjwD+3MnxOaWhtnTgJz8zJ8gEVDGyFVek/9SsfhoWjQvhLRUhu5rp58zGK4mMCXpEQltpg9r+0UyYtBXo9WR3tJRFNQazxYbXewOzaq6nk6TkFwPrh00b5fjWojX49OzxrzjSNebYFs7tDQx8XF4dNTgTyE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789980382; c=relaxed/simple; bh=q+7qkK+DIT7Y9lTf7sIFE4eYygtdXlgIbnOkbDTBmvY=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=ZmG+99AflU9T/3400HymjpAb6fXbPIf/su3YvC8RE9LZ5BhJN2oVfuqov1PPyI2yPQErsB8b/ZTmUdzmzqqQHD/5eHWa9Z/XaMil+rhms5uZlDA3uqCTEcO6C/YcJkwzIT7EiSaDzOJh2mecUCy/S8bL6nsjH5XUhzbvQI5xrGY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=j9aYjcPX; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="j9aYjcPX" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F277E1F00893; Mon, 21 Sep 2026 08:46:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789980379; bh=q+7qkK+DIT7Y9lTf7sIFE4eYygtdXlgIbnOkbDTBmvY=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=j9aYjcPXqIMvbKPOq1gzzZ0UF1iP1ZxWpr1SVtUZNccQtVOMmbZdbML8hHVeEv4lA Qz0EKeXrsxYQV3pAaZ9bsUjvCtj3/27Gr2zWNzC1l8Wh+7ClL5bL9Lhn6xmpvRpJUN lqM8l4OgNEOfh3DtW8UQWiA8uBAwkfoU6labMTKUx9at0zGbzpoiQfGwxmPijS3pmn BHUNcJik1Ez6P/qYJepRMpjXQO3S3+lk64oKNpwNaUyIDSFMudYzvcZ8NQ1sabCg0p N6YrxmZjxw/MdDkbc/dm1zu12f4U0NK1A3bloidA66tjAS9jNAz8euxPYpFd18/l+y 1PVN9ZFi/CzOg== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/11] s390/percpu: Use percpu code section for this_cpu_cmpxchg128() Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Heiko Carstens" Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Christian Borntraeger" , "Alexander Gordeev" , "Heiko Carstens" , "Vasily Gorbik" In-Reply-To: <20260921084005.4022574-9-hca@linux.ibm.com> References: <20260921084005.4022574-1-hca@linux.ibm.com> <20260921084005.4022574-9-hca@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 08:46:18 +0000 Message-Id: <20260921084618.F277E1F00893@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > Convert this_cpu_cmpxchg128() to make use of percpu code section > functionality. This is just for the sake of completeness, since > currently there is no in-kernel user of this_cpu_cmpxchg128(). >=20 > Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260921084005.4022= 574-1-hca@linux.ibm.com?part=3D8