From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8783449DB82 for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2026 13:25:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789997149; cv=none; b=ms0tFmeE9ERsnWCtvvIqzNjJ0P5KKx4AjuBgsMOvTw2qXaA6ltfX37quUjOkx7cgwHF0VePeLiOwiXeyxHjgttzuECIhjVwKub+NHm2hEelNPfj098RrZl4RTfYqdlvjwov4N15ODHB5oTxTif2afTEiSTZEW83jFES8Z7hcOtQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789997149; c=relaxed/simple; bh=t/PrczEbQYStTXErK+gk00UTmp1EotMdOg7dp0Nh9us=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=P3LrM7QvAbxqhCFdLSclFQ7Yh+DEMqL/lS9+ss/3kwe9/tdt0WN+hcbkrA/k67tfW3nrJtDqGX4xcr6PQnUkEPC6wYmDBTEgYH/f1E4yb0T2jn46ChwA5wYo/1+UsWfQjeB3HXUgMpmOLukdROlksAWzq8QoH4/CmhBuRwblFeI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=PIB/IA03; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="PIB/IA03" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DBC5F1F000FF; Mon, 21 Sep 2026 13:25:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789997148; bh=t/PrczEbQYStTXErK+gk00UTmp1EotMdOg7dp0Nh9us=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=PIB/IA031EJIBqkop/Win9bgr2iG46z0aqVeiezYRuLTmG7bXEMZl34rM6zAY70bQ 8b0jQI3IyTILhK5mhCaNh5juewWN9UvaA1WrqcwkSGTR1bEMgyYSVt9lJ0UvZHyro/ ieouBhd5/7ENuhCITgO4Kdj4V9LDxhLjlpRRfHnW28yzo3MKLNkRvDhtwjMQS8Bjje GF6xMgAjgUjfqJjZSlk0aGQ7uf9VG2ZwEqAt+w3O+4IBcIRfP5c53rvFsuJVtwMnvU WJNTHHSWVivF1et/BQSI+VrB6zd15n1xHd0KA6FDBEirLvxd9nzeoLeTcHCrsJQbaG V31QPj+TXCs0w== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] s390/cmf: Fix virtual vs physical address confusion Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Peter Oberparleiter" Cc: "Heiko Carstens" , "Alexander Gordeev" , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Christian Borntraeger" , "Vasily Gorbik" In-Reply-To: <20260921131648.3636771-1-oberpar@linux.ibm.com> References: <20260921131648.3636771-1-oberpar@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 13:25:47 +0000 Message-Id: <20260921132547.DBC5F1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > The measurement block address is an absolute address. Define the > associated schib_config and schib fields as dma64_t to enable automatic > detection of incorrect assignments. Also add the missing virt_to_dma64() > translation. >=20 > Without this fix, a wrong address will be used by firmware when storing > extended format channel measurement data on kernels built with > CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_IDENTITY_BASE=3Dy. >=20 > Fixes: 14edd0d73bfe ("s390/cmf: fix virtual vs physical address confusion= ") > Cc: > Signed-off-by: Peter Oberparleiter Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260921131648.3636= 771-1-oberpar@linux.ibm.com?part=3D1