From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 150904F85A9 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2026 06:51:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790059877; cv=none; b=OwX5ieRjVDs35T6PCNaH4w1mLOqvf/2LCSZhU32aPDYKsrLl253EzI3idGeuOspuA2w9imBEDLJIC5Y18SlAHG8ghO3YnQSYrr2i8ZZjwA73k8qaslK85SmvpuZEUBBrGZsrbggNcZNreUHUWZ1tEc5Z87H7neawP+lpsiwBOH4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790059877; c=relaxed/simple; bh=r1xt1JwEbhGiHg4nMpQfKPnrFGI39C5oEUbBTXpGG88=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=MIsYAKmSr82PMR2aU8+STHHZ56ZWH99Axx7J456uHWWp3iywZP7ahWWXPS5HAhnJMn4pbAjFv5rzPbhvNH9QAW7t7Mxux9xDJ+OeJe+I4zpzevEwkYx/THLOcOPHv+tieFSn4gL8mGkhnTxxFz6rj7Q1HjJ5N1LaRKrtLmCxlMs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=OxiiitT/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="OxiiitT/" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4DD591F0089A; Tue, 22 Sep 2026 06:51:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790059875; bh=V6Qv75oVnm/LgNE9qWZHWfQu85N0ZcJoblj2WQYbhtk=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=OxiiitT/EByCBCRwp9DTXApUnN0o6UPJV14TOsLiDjmyoYfaOqs8uV9Ace9Q3rXPh ixlWFiG3RDAYPedGaI5XMcG3b7uFZSLs5tehQeGEErVhbZDlRFQvYpTWFBK4sUYAbm YhPBVuoNmDruN+lXNLb1SM2JeFl11ncpTo+9HMuESaZz0TdC3h++hy1DjU/iT2KMWF npQUGWmAcDXtdl8CHytkVf+UhqGmZ3hSx7J6UQjZiG71LZEk/BzeAT31oIOBWInNOV 8czIjkLE6lgXHXhN17NuNQd6KO9yFi2UJxQ14OkX/d8844OVsd2i4NUmAqjeweDQEO VbL/k2/9KLCyg== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] s390/sclp: Make parsing of received event buffers more robust Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Alexander Egorenkov" Cc: "Alexander Gordeev" , "Vasily Gorbik" , "Christian Borntraeger" , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Carstens" In-Reply-To: <20260922064303.524293-2-egorenar@linux.ibm.com> References: <20260922064303.524293-1-egorenar@linux.ibm.com> <20260922064303.524293-2-egorenar@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 06:51:14 +0000 Message-Id: <20260922065115.4DD591F0089A@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > Ensure that > * an event buffer does not cross the end boundary of the SCCB buffer it is > part of > * the total length of an event buffer is not smaller than the size of > its header >=20 > Signed-off-by: Alexander Egorenkov Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260922064303.5242= 93-1-egorenar@linux.ibm.com?part=3D1