From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D3EB47CC78 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 12:43:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790253834; cv=none; b=dCU6shKjeqoyUPuQJ9C3NcnESVpDhEUN1DUulYEp+qhX2SUmIl9kTd7Yknh8CIDTMmw0oTXjeWcrmvaIqBaTkLaMj6MfQcCHdIZz3FI4QJt58YvafgpykKL7crwiS5091fVA13Zhw/kuzLkNPyImfF824AbilM4Eb694ZlYLmsM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790253834; c=relaxed/simple; bh=T/DP9gF6VMFraJqWzJdariUs4/scuzad+0SNh0h/dBw=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=AkmaiwmKGvXVBXa2wAwgdR0vRU8FtrINOfLOlWVwNq1czX0Q+TULPPqg/u4eGySMfC1azLl5eYLrSTsANLTNjJ3ObKfg2Prz3pPn4LfYeTaONEp+byg9+1QCYSWQZ604CQWKV3aVe+vPqprfXXviAg5Sp5x604Wlx7eqjNwRW1c= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=bFNvjxos; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="bFNvjxos" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8FDD61F000FF; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 12:43:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790253829; bh=T/DP9gF6VMFraJqWzJdariUs4/scuzad+0SNh0h/dBw=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=bFNvjxosLQn3edghSIq7v3uSIDW3mwvGc7mkuGd3WkYctAoctPPwDC1ABFG94ddgz MpOHpZ2l+OmGn9xWVZnCCf7m0fxiiNsCgUSsB/h45rGwlMcnuaGZqbhuxR1X+wxs85 hDSgXtm6gwtwRl1mpmp/fnmQrsXezHybgr5vl0MPzYTzqd6j/rZ09oEAcZ1fOgoIvT zt64JHdL/ARbQFdWUIKoMNKl1jMbJqmZqCZiIUCgQ16zBGiuR9LxTJYWgXajU4nljO eJak9ap+wjPlHEIxifv7p2Hk/Wkbp71KIo4KjBGLHxpqkOiYtR8oeZ1PL4bQZK+Db5 Pbq902QOU7ggw== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] s390: remove unwind_module_init() Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Johannes Berg" Cc: "Christian Borntraeger" , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Carstens" , "Vasily Gorbik" , "Alexander Gordeev" In-Reply-To: <20260924144039.4af0d88b163a.I91f8c59a12ad3d5fe67d50aa3b0434d666ffc9f8@changeid> References: <20260924124039.1621965-6-johannes@sipsolutions.net> <20260924144039.4af0d88b163a.I91f8c59a12ad3d5fe67d50aa3b0434d666ffc9f8@changeid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 12:43:49 +0000 Message-Id: <20260924124349.8FDD61F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > From: Johannes Berg >=20 > This is dead code, but will likely conflict with > the ORC unwinder unification. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260924124039.1621= 965-6-johannes@sipsolutions.net?part=3D1