From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FBCE2EACEF for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2026 10:44:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790851493; cv=none; b=ukZWmcveVwfhyvE65q0ug0SAc5f+f6Teh5qm+w/TZiU92ikmezM4FAbTbJmuCiFHWEv7IXZyhqPv43gHMDdynBKO3EQJvQMWmj+bh9llZ8wODTGbtU3/mosdfAxfskuCaqkK2EuJtBRHeh13dCWEiHbRqJgRnJSMOGXjJbaUg1U= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790851493; c=relaxed/simple; bh=dl2IGIUsL+im8nDxVIO7h0xpze7+VSI/DtVUkJ8+Zjc=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=DsmAcm+45DmeC5620F8n9HYWAIXAWUypNELjkN4zUeYH9jnjZk3RM6jqe8ptRSO0ewyB6XBu+9ySAm6FdmhyxZrZcXnYkTvP//Mx1oqJ9ECwb1pdmHChBzSv6gbeuXz4/rAeXqeXnGHxWhn4xF9fB8FpRzqRmkMnDwdeF81uR+U= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=IzxHwC+J; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="IzxHwC+J" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EF3E61F000FF; Thu, 1 Oct 2026 10:44:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790851492; bh=dl2IGIUsL+im8nDxVIO7h0xpze7+VSI/DtVUkJ8+Zjc=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=IzxHwC+JdXxxUgLeyTIOT7JmcjOt6ucNCIU3UEuh4Avq9YnZMYFnPpyjRtSNW9uEU LuepTtjoNtIUsC2J2zdlsRP59b1fbOfQxxpGXfKVUTCoIWK6bDAFjGqZvdtEnsU4SQ 5AyP5FyoHwj800ifau/JmfP6fZ+AmQASaThA7X9WQOMoRtYtj8nqW14VLH8R0CWmdm C8AxlgnprBTlwnrUUgx8x54HbvGUdM/21UGGXwfcnQKYWTmzqd+y6Bkald0+piPZwa HOQ4lyuLhBl95MmXggGH4haki821zC27uIZKxoCBagl26kKXHTYoLWnz1UhZ83mDRn 2LxB05DRvIXiQ== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/32] s390: Clear pt_regs flags field Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Heiko Carstens" Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Christian Borntraeger" , "Alexander Gordeev" , "Vasily Gorbik" , "Heiko Carstens" In-Reply-To: <20261001103247.1989111-4-hca@linux.ibm.com> References: <20261001103247.1989111-1-hca@linux.ibm.com> <20261001103247.1989111-4-hca@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2026 10:44:51 +0000 Message-Id: <20261001104451.EF3E61F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > Clear the pt_regs flags field in the early program check handler as well > as in the stack_invalid handler. Without this the pt_regs flags field will > have random values, depending on previous stack contents. >=20 > This matters currently for bug reporting and disassembly, where flags like > PIF_PSW_ADDR_ADJUSTED may then be incorrectly set, which could lead to a > partially incorrect disassembly or wrong code markers. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261001103247.1989= 111-1-hca@linux.ibm.com?part=3D3