From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Howells Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] rwsem: Implement down_read_killable() Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 09:30:14 +0100 Message-ID: <2406.1497947414@warthog.procyon.org.uk> References: <149789463636.9059.16943955939303454611.stgit@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-ID: <407.1497945958.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Sender: linux-alpha-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: David Rientjes Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Kirill Tkhai , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, avagin@virtuozzo.com, peterz@infradead.org, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, hpa@zytor.com, gorcunov@virtuozzo.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, mattst88@gmail.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com, arnd@arndb.de, ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru, tglx@linutronix.de, rth@twiddle.net, tony.luck@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, davem@davemloft.net List-ID: David Rientjes wrote: > I would have expected to see down_read_killable() actually used somewhere > after its implementation as part of this patchset. There are some places we should be using down_{read|write}_interruptible(), if it existed, dressed as inode_lock{,_shared}_interruptible(). David