From: Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>
To: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, jjherne@linux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@de.ibm.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
mjrosato@linux.ibm.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com,
alex.williamson@redhat.com, kwankhede@nvidia.com,
fiuczy@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] s390/vfio-ap: verify reset complete in separate function
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 09:24:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <29a5eb8259fc9735aa3a7de5334d9919@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221213154437.15480-2-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
On 2022-12-13 16:44, Tony Krowiak wrote:
> The vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue() function contains a loop to verify that
> the
> reset successfully completes within 40ms. This patch moves that loop
> into
> a separate function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> index 0b4cc8c597ae..83ff94a38102 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> @@ -1587,12 +1587,30 @@ static struct vfio_ap_queue
> *vfio_ap_find_queue(int apqn)
> return q;
> }
>
> +static int apq_reset_check(struct vfio_ap_queue *q)
> +{
> + int iters = 2;
> + struct ap_queue_status status;
> +
> + while (iters--) {
> + msleep(20);
> + status = ap_tapq(q->apqn, NULL);
> + if (status.queue_empty && !status.irq_enabled)
> + return 0;
> + }
> + WARN_ONCE(iters <= 0,
> + "timeout verifying reset of queue %02x.%04x (%u, %u, %u)",
> + AP_QID_CARD(q->apqn), AP_QID_QUEUE(q->apqn),
> + status.queue_empty, status.irq_enabled, status.response_code);
> +
> + return -EBUSY;
> +}
> +
> static int vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue(struct vfio_ap_queue *q,
> unsigned int retry)
> {
> struct ap_queue_status status;
> int ret;
> - int retry2 = 2;
>
> if (!q)
> return 0;
> @@ -1629,14 +1647,8 @@ static int vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue(struct
> vfio_ap_queue *q,
> }
>
> /* wait for the reset to take effect */
> - while (retry2--) {
> - if (status.queue_empty && !status.irq_enabled)
> - break;
> - msleep(20);
> - status = ap_tapq(q->apqn, NULL);
> - }
> - WARN_ONCE(retry2 <= 0, "unable to verify reset of queue %02x.%04x",
> - AP_QID_CARD(q->apqn), AP_QID_QUEUE(q->apqn));
> + if (!status.queue_empty && status.irq_enabled)
Hm, you check for
a) status.queue_empty and
b) !status.irq_enabled
which is (status.queue_empty && !status.irq_enabled)
and now let's negate this to:
!(status.queue_empty && !status.irq_enabled)
with de-morgan this gives:
(!status.queue_empty || status.irq_enabled)
> + ret = apq_reset_check(q);
>
> free_resources:
> vfio_ap_free_aqic_resources(q);
Reviewed-by: Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-15 8:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-13 15:44 [PATCH 0/7] improve AP queue reset processing Tony Krowiak
2022-12-13 15:44 ` [PATCH 1/7] s390/vfio-ap: verify reset complete in separate function Tony Krowiak
2022-12-15 8:24 ` Harald Freudenberger [this message]
2022-12-13 15:44 ` [PATCH 2/7] s390/vfio_ap: check TAPQ response code when waiting for queue reset Tony Krowiak
2022-12-15 10:48 ` Harald Freudenberger
2022-12-13 15:44 ` [PATCH 3/7] s390/vfio_ap: use TAPQ to verify reset in progress completes Tony Krowiak
2022-12-15 10:51 ` Harald Freudenberger
2022-12-20 14:22 ` Anthony Krowiak
2022-12-13 15:44 ` [PATCH 4/7] s390/vfio_ap: verify ZAPQ completion after return of response code zero Tony Krowiak
2022-12-15 10:54 ` Harald Freudenberger
2022-12-20 14:24 ` Anthony Krowiak
2022-12-13 15:44 ` [PATCH 5/7] s390/vfio_ap: fix handling of error response codes Tony Krowiak
2022-12-15 10:56 ` Harald Freudenberger
2022-12-20 14:25 ` Anthony Krowiak
2022-12-13 15:44 ` [PATCH 6/7] s390/vfio_ap: increase max wait time for reset verification Tony Krowiak
2022-12-15 10:58 ` Harald Freudenberger
2022-12-20 14:27 ` Anthony Krowiak
2022-12-13 15:44 ` [PATCH 7/7] s390/vfio_ap: always clean up IRQ resources Tony Krowiak
2022-12-15 10:58 ` Harald Freudenberger
2022-12-19 14:10 ` Halil Pasic
2022-12-20 14:33 ` Anthony Krowiak
2022-12-20 17:24 ` Halil Pasic
2023-01-09 19:40 ` Anthony Krowiak
2022-12-14 15:16 ` [PATCH 0/7] improve AP queue reset processing Jason J. Herne
2022-12-14 19:10 ` Anthony Krowiak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=29a5eb8259fc9735aa3a7de5334d9919@linux.ibm.com \
--to=freude@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=fiuczy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).