linux-s390.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>
To: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, jjherne@linux.ibm.com,
	borntraeger@de.ibm.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
	mjrosato@linux.ibm.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com,
	alex.williamson@redhat.com, kwankhede@nvidia.com,
	fiuczy@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] s390/vfio-ap: verify reset complete in separate function
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 09:24:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <29a5eb8259fc9735aa3a7de5334d9919@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221213154437.15480-2-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>

On 2022-12-13 16:44, Tony Krowiak wrote:
> The vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue() function contains a loop to verify that 
> the
> reset successfully completes within 40ms. This patch moves that loop 
> into
> a separate function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> index 0b4cc8c597ae..83ff94a38102 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> @@ -1587,12 +1587,30 @@ static struct vfio_ap_queue
> *vfio_ap_find_queue(int apqn)
>  	return q;
>  }
> 
> +static int apq_reset_check(struct vfio_ap_queue *q)
> +{
> +	int iters = 2;
> +	struct ap_queue_status status;
> +
> +	while (iters--) {
> +		msleep(20);
> +		status = ap_tapq(q->apqn, NULL);
> +		if (status.queue_empty && !status.irq_enabled)
> +			return 0;
> +	}
> +	WARN_ONCE(iters <= 0,
> +		  "timeout verifying reset of queue %02x.%04x (%u, %u, %u)",
> +		  AP_QID_CARD(q->apqn), AP_QID_QUEUE(q->apqn),
> +		  status.queue_empty, status.irq_enabled, status.response_code);
> +
> +	return -EBUSY;
> +}
> +
>  static int vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue(struct vfio_ap_queue *q,
>  				    unsigned int retry)
>  {
>  	struct ap_queue_status status;
>  	int ret;
> -	int retry2 = 2;
> 
>  	if (!q)
>  		return 0;
> @@ -1629,14 +1647,8 @@ static int vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue(struct
> vfio_ap_queue *q,
>  	}
> 
>  	/* wait for the reset to take effect */
> -	while (retry2--) {
> -		if (status.queue_empty && !status.irq_enabled)
> -			break;
> -		msleep(20);
> -		status = ap_tapq(q->apqn, NULL);
> -	}
> -	WARN_ONCE(retry2 <= 0, "unable to verify reset of queue %02x.%04x",
> -		  AP_QID_CARD(q->apqn), AP_QID_QUEUE(q->apqn));
> +	if (!status.queue_empty && status.irq_enabled)

Hm, you check for
   a) status.queue_empty and
   b) !status.irq_enabled
   which is (status.queue_empty && !status.irq_enabled)
   and now let's negate this to:
   !(status.queue_empty && !status.irq_enabled)
   with de-morgan this gives:
   (!status.queue_empty || status.irq_enabled)

> +		ret = apq_reset_check(q);
> 
>  free_resources:
>  	vfio_ap_free_aqic_resources(q);

Reviewed-by: Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-15  8:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-13 15:44 [PATCH 0/7] improve AP queue reset processing Tony Krowiak
2022-12-13 15:44 ` [PATCH 1/7] s390/vfio-ap: verify reset complete in separate function Tony Krowiak
2022-12-15  8:24   ` Harald Freudenberger [this message]
2022-12-13 15:44 ` [PATCH 2/7] s390/vfio_ap: check TAPQ response code when waiting for queue reset Tony Krowiak
2022-12-15 10:48   ` Harald Freudenberger
2022-12-13 15:44 ` [PATCH 3/7] s390/vfio_ap: use TAPQ to verify reset in progress completes Tony Krowiak
2022-12-15 10:51   ` Harald Freudenberger
2022-12-20 14:22     ` Anthony Krowiak
2022-12-13 15:44 ` [PATCH 4/7] s390/vfio_ap: verify ZAPQ completion after return of response code zero Tony Krowiak
2022-12-15 10:54   ` Harald Freudenberger
2022-12-20 14:24     ` Anthony Krowiak
2022-12-13 15:44 ` [PATCH 5/7] s390/vfio_ap: fix handling of error response codes Tony Krowiak
2022-12-15 10:56   ` Harald Freudenberger
2022-12-20 14:25     ` Anthony Krowiak
2022-12-13 15:44 ` [PATCH 6/7] s390/vfio_ap: increase max wait time for reset verification Tony Krowiak
2022-12-15 10:58   ` Harald Freudenberger
2022-12-20 14:27     ` Anthony Krowiak
2022-12-13 15:44 ` [PATCH 7/7] s390/vfio_ap: always clean up IRQ resources Tony Krowiak
2022-12-15 10:58   ` Harald Freudenberger
2022-12-19 14:10   ` Halil Pasic
2022-12-20 14:33     ` Anthony Krowiak
2022-12-20 17:24       ` Halil Pasic
2023-01-09 19:40         ` Anthony Krowiak
2022-12-14 15:16 ` [PATCH 0/7] improve AP queue reset processing Jason J. Herne
2022-12-14 19:10   ` Anthony Krowiak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=29a5eb8259fc9735aa3a7de5334d9919@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=freude@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=fiuczy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).