linux-s390.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: "Sean Christopherson" <seanjc@google.com>,
	"Andrew Jones" <andrew.jones@linux.dev>,
	"Janosch Frank" <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Claudio Imbrenda" <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Nico Böhr" <nrb@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 03/16] x86: Add X86_PROPERTY_* framework to retrieve CPUID values
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 14:14:34 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <32587e5d-d1d7-4a39-992e-f0b064cb96e3@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250529221929.3807680-4-seanjc@google.com>


On 5/30/2025 6:19 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Introduce X86_PROPERTY_* to allow retrieving values/properties from CPUID
> leafs, e.g. MAXPHYADDR from CPUID.0x80000008.  Use the same core code as
> X86_FEATURE_*, the primary difference is that properties are multi-bit
> values, whereas features enumerate a single bit.
>
> Add this_cpu_has_p() to allow querying whether or not a property exists
> based on the maximum leaf associated with the property, e.g. MAXPHYADDR
> doesn't exist if the max leaf for 0x8000_xxxx is less than 0x8000_0008.
>
> Use the new property infrastructure in cpuid_maxphyaddr() to prove that
> the code works as intended.  Future patches will convert additional code.
>
> Note, the code, nomenclature, changelog, etc. are all stolen from KVM
> selftests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> ---
>  lib/x86/processor.h | 109 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 102 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/x86/processor.h b/lib/x86/processor.h
> index 3ac6711d..6b61a38b 100644
> --- a/lib/x86/processor.h
> +++ b/lib/x86/processor.h
> @@ -218,13 +218,6 @@ static inline struct cpuid cpuid(u32 function)
>  	return cpuid_indexed(function, 0);
>  }
>  
> -static inline u8 cpuid_maxphyaddr(void)
> -{
> -	if (raw_cpuid(0x80000000, 0).a < 0x80000008)
> -	return 36;
> -	return raw_cpuid(0x80000008, 0).a & 0xff;
> -}
> -
>  static inline bool is_intel(void)
>  {
>  	struct cpuid c = cpuid(0);
> @@ -329,6 +322,74 @@ struct x86_cpu_feature {
>  #define X86_FEATURE_VNMI		X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x8000000A, 0, EDX, 25)
>  #define	X86_FEATURE_AMD_PMU_V2		X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x80000022, 0, EAX, 0)
>  
> +/*
> + * Same idea as X86_FEATURE_XXX, but X86_PROPERTY_XXX retrieves a multi-bit
> + * value/property as opposed to a single-bit feature.  Again, pack the info
> + * into a 64-bit value to pass by value with no overhead on 64-bit builds.
> + */
> +struct x86_cpu_property {
> +	u32	function;
> +	u8	index;
> +	u8	reg;
> +	u8	lo_bit;
> +	u8	hi_bit;
> +};
> +#define	X86_CPU_PROPERTY(fn, idx, gpr, low_bit, high_bit)			\
> +({										\
> +	struct x86_cpu_property property = {					\
> +		.function = fn,							\
> +		.index = idx,							\
> +		.reg = gpr,							\
> +		.lo_bit = low_bit,						\
> +		.hi_bit = high_bit,						\
> +	};									\
> +										\
> +	static_assert(low_bit < high_bit);					\
> +	static_assert((fn & 0xc0000000) == 0 ||					\
> +		      (fn & 0xc0000000) == 0x40000000 ||			\
> +		      (fn & 0xc0000000) == 0x80000000 ||			\
> +		      (fn & 0xc0000000) == 0xc0000000);				\
> +	static_assert(idx < BIT(sizeof(property.index) * BITS_PER_BYTE));	\
> +	property;								\
> +})
> +
> +#define X86_PROPERTY_MAX_BASIC_LEAF		X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0, 0, EAX, 0, 31)
> +#define X86_PROPERTY_PMU_VERSION		X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0xa, 0, EAX, 0, 7)
> +#define X86_PROPERTY_PMU_NR_GP_COUNTERS		X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0xa, 0, EAX, 8, 15)
> +#define X86_PROPERTY_PMU_GP_COUNTERS_BIT_WIDTH	X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0xa, 0, EAX, 16, 23)
> +#define X86_PROPERTY_PMU_EBX_BIT_VECTOR_LENGTH	X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0xa, 0, EAX, 24, 31)
> +#define X86_PROPERTY_PMU_EVENTS_MASK		X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0xa, 0, EBX, 0, 7)
> +#define X86_PROPERTY_PMU_FIXED_COUNTERS_BITMASK	X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0xa, 0, ECX, 0, 31)
> +#define X86_PROPERTY_PMU_NR_FIXED_COUNTERS	X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0xa, 0, EDX, 0, 4)
> +#define X86_PROPERTY_PMU_FIXED_COUNTERS_BIT_WIDTH	X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0xa, 0, EDX, 5, 12)
> +
> +#define X86_PROPERTY_SUPPORTED_XCR0_LO		X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0xd,  0, EAX,  0, 31)
> +#define X86_PROPERTY_XSTATE_MAX_SIZE_XCR0	X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0xd,  0, EBX,  0, 31)
> +#define X86_PROPERTY_XSTATE_MAX_SIZE		X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0xd,  0, ECX,  0, 31)
> +#define X86_PROPERTY_SUPPORTED_XCR0_HI		X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0xd,  0, EDX,  0, 31)
> +
> +#define X86_PROPERTY_XSTATE_TILE_SIZE		X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0xd, 18, EAX,  0, 31)
> +#define X86_PROPERTY_XSTATE_TILE_OFFSET		X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0xd, 18, EBX,  0, 31)
> +#define X86_PROPERTY_AMX_MAX_PALETTE_TABLES	X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0x1d, 0, EAX,  0, 31)
> +#define X86_PROPERTY_AMX_TOTAL_TILE_BYTES	X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0x1d, 1, EAX,  0, 15)
> +#define X86_PROPERTY_AMX_BYTES_PER_TILE		X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0x1d, 1, EAX, 16, 31)
> +#define X86_PROPERTY_AMX_BYTES_PER_ROW		X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0x1d, 1, EBX, 0,  15)
> +#define X86_PROPERTY_AMX_NR_TILE_REGS		X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0x1d, 1, EBX, 16, 31)
> +#define X86_PROPERTY_AMX_MAX_ROWS		X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0x1d, 1, ECX, 0,  15)
> +
> +#define X86_PROPERTY_MAX_KVM_LEAF		X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0x40000000, 0, EAX, 0, 31)
> +
> +#define X86_PROPERTY_MAX_EXT_LEAF		X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0x80000000, 0, EAX, 0, 31)
> +#define X86_PROPERTY_MAX_PHY_ADDR		X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0x80000008, 0, EAX, 0, 7)
> +#define X86_PROPERTY_MAX_VIRT_ADDR		X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0x80000008, 0, EAX, 8, 15)
> +#define X86_PROPERTY_GUEST_MAX_PHY_ADDR		X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0x80000008, 0, EAX, 16, 23)
> +#define X86_PROPERTY_SEV_C_BIT			X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0x8000001F, 0, EBX, 0, 5)
> +#define X86_PROPERTY_PHYS_ADDR_REDUCTION	X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0x8000001F, 0, EBX, 6, 11)
> +#define X86_PROPERTY_NR_PERFCTR_CORE		X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0x80000022, 0, EBX, 0, 3)
> +#define X86_PROPERTY_NR_PERFCTR_NB		X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0x80000022, 0, EBX, 10, 15)
> +
> +#define X86_PROPERTY_MAX_CENTAUR_LEAF		X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0xC0000000, 0, EAX, 0, 31)
> +
>  static inline u32 __this_cpu_has(u32 function, u32 index, u8 reg, u8 lo, u8 hi)
>  {
>  	union {
> @@ -347,6 +408,40 @@ static inline bool this_cpu_has(struct x86_cpu_feature feature)
>  			      feature.reg, feature.bit, feature.bit);
>  }
>  
> +static inline uint32_t this_cpu_property(struct x86_cpu_property property)
> +{
> +	return __this_cpu_has(property.function, property.index,
> +			      property.reg, property.lo_bit, property.hi_bit);
> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline bool this_cpu_has_p(struct x86_cpu_property property)
> +{
> +	uint32_t max_leaf;
> +
> +	switch (property.function & 0xc0000000) {
> +	case 0:
> +		max_leaf = this_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_MAX_BASIC_LEAF);
> +		break;
> +	case 0x40000000:
> +		max_leaf = this_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_MAX_KVM_LEAF);
> +		break;
> +	case 0x80000000:
> +		max_leaf = this_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_MAX_EXT_LEAF);
> +		break;
> +	case 0xc0000000:
> +		max_leaf = this_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_MAX_CENTAUR_LEAF);
> +	}
> +	return max_leaf >= property.function;
> +}
> +
> +static inline u8 cpuid_maxphyaddr(void)
> +{
> +	if (!this_cpu_has_p(X86_PROPERTY_MAX_PHY_ADDR))
> +		return 36;
> +
> +	return this_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_MAX_PHY_ADDR);
> +}
> +
>  struct far_pointer32 {
>  	u32 offset;
>  	u16 selector;

LGTM.

Reviewed-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>



  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-10  6:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-29 22:19 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 00/16] x86: Add CPUID properties, clean up related code Sean Christopherson
2025-05-29 22:19 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 01/16] lib: Add and use static_assert() convenience wrappers Sean Christopherson
2025-05-30  6:03   ` Andrew Jones
2025-05-30  9:01   ` Janosch Frank
2025-06-10  6:04   ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-05-29 22:19 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 02/16] x86: Encode X86_FEATURE_* definitions using a structure Sean Christopherson
2025-06-10  6:08   ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-10 13:56     ` Sean Christopherson
2025-05-29 22:19 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 03/16] x86: Add X86_PROPERTY_* framework to retrieve CPUID values Sean Christopherson
2025-06-10  6:14   ` Mi, Dapeng [this message]
2025-05-29 22:19 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 04/16] x86: Use X86_PROPERTY_MAX_VIRT_ADDR in is_canonical() Sean Christopherson
2025-06-10  6:16   ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-05-29 22:19 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 05/16] x86: Implement get_supported_xcr0() using X86_PROPERTY_SUPPORTED_XCR0_{LO,HI} Sean Christopherson
2025-06-10  6:18   ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-05-29 22:19 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 06/16] x86: Add and use X86_PROPERTY_INTEL_PT_NR_RANGES Sean Christopherson
2025-06-10  6:21   ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-05-29 22:19 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 07/16] x86/pmu: Rename pmu_gp_counter_is_available() to pmu_arch_event_is_available() Sean Christopherson
2025-06-10  7:09   ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-10 16:16     ` Sean Christopherson
2025-06-11  0:41       ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-05-29 22:19 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 08/16] x86/pmu: Rename gp_counter_mask_length to arch_event_mask_length Sean Christopherson
2025-06-10  7:22   ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-05-29 22:19 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 09/16] x86/pmu: Mark all arch events as available on AMD Sean Christopherson
2025-05-29 22:19 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 10/16] x86/pmu: Use X86_PROPERTY_PMU_* macros to retrieve PMU information Sean Christopherson
2025-06-10  7:29   ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-05-29 22:19 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 11/16] x86/sev: Use VC_VECTOR from processor.h Sean Christopherson
2025-06-10  7:25   ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-05-29 22:19 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 12/16] x86/sev: Skip the AMD SEV test if SEV is unsupported/disabled Sean Christopherson
2025-05-29 22:19 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 13/16] x86/sev: Define and use X86_FEATURE_* flags for CPUID 0x8000001F Sean Christopherson
2025-05-29 22:19 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 14/16] x86/sev: Use X86_PROPERTY_SEV_C_BIT to get the AMD SEV C-bit location Sean Christopherson
2025-05-29 22:19 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 15/16] x86/sev: Use amd_sev_es_enabled() to detect if SEV-ES is enabled Sean Christopherson
2025-05-30 16:22   ` Liam Merwick
2025-05-29 22:19 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 16/16] x86: Move SEV MSR definitions to msr.h Sean Christopherson
2025-06-10 19:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 00/16] x86: Add CPUID properties, clean up related code Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=32587e5d-d1d7-4a39-992e-f0b064cb96e3@linux.intel.com \
    --to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andrew.jones@linux.dev \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).