Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 3/9] s390x: gs: move to new header file

Nico Boehr
2022-03-28T08:01:56Z

On Fri, 2022-03-25 at 17:38 +0100, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> > Do we need load_guarded() in this new header?
> > The load/store_gscb() functions have potential to be shared across
> > tests
> > but the lg doesn't need to be executed, no?
> >
> > We could opt to leave it in gs.c instead
>
> yes, probably a better idea. I'd still add the comment, though :)
>
> shall I just fix this up when picking?

I like the suggestion by Janosch.

Since I will sent the ADTL STATUS test (patch 4) in a seperate series
anyways, I think it makes more sense if I include the patch there and
you don't pick patches 3 and 4 from this series.