From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] clean up redundant 'kvm_run' parameters References: <20200427043514.16144-1-tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com> From: Tianjia Zhang Message-ID: <3a2bee8b-20b4-5d33-7d12-09c374a5afde@linux.alibaba.com> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 18:00:09 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Paolo Bonzini , tsbogend@alpha.franken.de, paulus@ozlabs.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, benh@kernel.crashing.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com, sean.j.christopherson@intel.com, vkuznets@redhat.com, wanpengli@tencent.com, jmattson@google.com, joro@8bytes.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, maz@kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com, julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, christoffer.dall@arm.com, peterx@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com, chenhuacai@gmail.com Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2020/6/23 17:42, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 27/04/20 06:35, Tianjia Zhang wrote: >> In the current kvm version, 'kvm_run' has been included in the 'kvm_vcpu' >> structure. For historical reasons, many kvm-related function parameters >> retain the 'kvm_run' and 'kvm_vcpu' parameters at the same time. This >> patch does a unified cleanup of these remaining redundant parameters. >> >> This series of patches has completely cleaned the architecture of >> arm64, mips, ppc, and s390 (no such redundant code on x86). Due to >> the large number of modified codes, a separate patch is made for each >> platform. On the ppc platform, there is also a redundant structure >> pointer of 'kvm_run' in 'vcpu_arch', which has also been cleaned >> separately. > > Tianjia, can you please refresh the patches so that each architecture > maintainer can pick them up? Thanks very much for this work! > > Paolo > No problem, this is what I should do. After I update, do I submit separately for each architecture or submit them together in a patchset? Thanks, Tianjia