From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:2683 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728286AbfIDXOJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Sep 2019 19:14:09 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm/pgtable/debug: Add test validating architecture page table helpers References: <1567497706-8649-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> <1567497706-8649-2-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> From: Dave Hansen Message-ID: <3b67e4d8-ba67-e7b2-f4d1-1276262d349e@intel.com> Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 16:14:08 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1567497706-8649-2-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-s390-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Anshuman Khandual , linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: Andrew Morton , Vlastimil Babka , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Thomas Gleixner , Mike Rapoport , Jason Gunthorpe , Dan Williams , Peter Zijlstra , Michal Hocko , Mark Rutland , Mark Brown , Steven Price , Ard Biesheuvel , Masahiro Yamada , Kees Cook , Tetsuo Handa , Matthew Wilcox , Sri Krishna chowdary , Russell King - ARM Linux , Michael Ellerman , Paul Mackerras , Martin Schwidefsky , Heiko Carstens , "David S. Miller" , Vineet Gupta , James Hogan , Paul Burton , Ralf Baechle , linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Shutemov, Kirill" On 9/3/19 1:01 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > This adds a test module which will validate architecture page table helpers > and accessors regarding compliance with generic MM semantics expectations. > This will help various architectures in validating changes to the existing > page table helpers or addition of new ones. This looks really cool. The "only" complication on x86 is the large number of compile and runtime options that we have. When this gets merged, it would be really nice to make sure that the 0day guys have good coverage of all the configurations. I'm not _quite_ sure what kind of bugs it will catch on x86 and I suspect it'll have more value for the other architectures, but it seems harmless enough.