From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, david@kernel.org, borntraeger@linux.ibm.com,
cohuck@redhat.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
imbrenda@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 00/12] KVM: s390: Changes for 7.1
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2026 14:28:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3eec3725-91ae-48e4-a370-9c1bdd7693a2@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABgObfaWO3J89sFmu3ZBPTztXcKgXPZu3FyiRcasejS=0tgJYQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 4/13/26 13:23, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2026 at 12:47 PM Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hey Paolo,
>>
>> here are our changes for 7.1:
>> - Claudio is finishing up gmap work by allowing 4k memslots
>> - Eric and Hendrik added nesting ESA support
>> - I've fixed up LPSW/E emulation, going through next as I don't expect
>> us to ever hit this
>>
>> There's been two conflicts because 7.0 received a number of gmap fixes.
>
> This is just nearby lines being touched, I think? No real conflict.
It's code that's missing in next since we had a lot of changes in
master. One is a conflict where the next list of selftests does not
include the irq routing test that I added in kvm-s390-master-7.0-1. I.e.
trivial.
The other is __gmap_link() that's introduced in a fix but is not around
yet for 4204067f99820 in next.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-13 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-13 10:46 [GIT PULL 00/12] KVM: s390: Changes for 7.1 Janosch Frank
2026-04-13 10:46 ` [GIT PULL 01/12] KVM: s390: only deliver service interrupt with payload Janosch Frank
2026-04-13 10:46 ` [GIT PULL 02/12] KVM: s390: Fix lpsw/e breaking event handling Janosch Frank
2026-04-13 10:46 ` [GIT PULL 03/12] KVM: s390: vsie: Allow non-zarch guests Janosch Frank
2026-04-13 10:46 ` [GIT PULL 04/12] KVM: s390: vsie: Disable some bits when in ESA mode Janosch Frank
2026-04-13 10:46 ` [GIT PULL 05/12] KVM: s390: vsie: Accommodate ESA prefix pages Janosch Frank
2026-04-13 10:46 ` [GIT PULL 06/12] KVM: s390: Add KVM capability for ESA mode guests Janosch Frank
2026-04-13 10:46 ` [GIT PULL 07/12] KVM: s390: Add some useful mask macros Janosch Frank
2026-04-13 10:46 ` [GIT PULL 08/12] KVM: s390: Add alignment checks for hugepages Janosch Frank
2026-04-13 10:46 ` [GIT PULL 09/12] KVM: s390: Allow 4k granularity for memslots Janosch Frank
2026-04-13 10:46 ` [GIT PULL 10/12] KVM: selftests: Remove 1M alignment requirement for s390 Janosch Frank
2026-04-13 10:46 ` [GIT PULL 11/12] KVM: s390: selftests: enable some common memory-related tests Janosch Frank
2026-04-13 10:46 ` [GIT PULL 12/12] KVM: s390: ucontrol: Fix memslot handling Janosch Frank
2026-04-13 11:23 ` [GIT PULL 00/12] KVM: s390: Changes for 7.1 Paolo Bonzini
2026-04-13 12:28 ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2026-04-13 12:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3eec3725-91ae-48e4-a370-9c1bdd7693a2@linux.ibm.com \
--to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox