From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA585C433EF for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 14:11:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD419611EF for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 14:11:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233120AbhKEOOf (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Nov 2021 10:14:35 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:32080 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233098AbhKEOOf (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Nov 2021 10:14:35 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 1A5BUXL2023896 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 14:11:55 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=message-id : subject : from : to : cc : date : in-reply-to : references : content-type : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=P2m9aUGX/Bn53qB4Ka+0itGi/NpxAQgkanLuEPKqnwM=; b=mfcq+bl7NwJyR4LLMMdCPAjyZPoxDTTg32maeMerpp0kx9JFpILRn1N80B6xMH/9gEI9 YYzUE0Dosdtd57H6TVcpFJ1rYOe8t0PR+o9yjmbJAwajZ4Vl7tV0dwLhQP+k2Dl5CLU8 h1glXiVBRhCG16DWbtX24uhynetLDWzgUHXHtr3W1Bc0e1YOKJx1MoVNb33Yg3RNSau8 eRcKh/ef57HNwO2wqY9ZTX/B0AFTeg/OkJ0VY3zyE0EB3lkROKD/Mf22A+WXNvdN0yEz AeUu+q6q7A9PITY+MAqy26dnEquRW/VY+JOjk5PS6zx2v1gwuTna34jjOCe1jlw3gYTM cA== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3c50y2pjna-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 05 Nov 2021 14:11:54 +0000 Received: from m0098419.ppops.net (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 1A5DnvFn008101 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 14:11:54 GMT Received: from ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (66.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.102]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3c50y2pjmw-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 05 Nov 2021 14:11:54 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 1A5E7KvB001977; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 14:11:52 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.194]) by ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3c4t4dde76-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 05 Nov 2021 14:11:52 +0000 Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.160]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 1A5EBndB44499332 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 5 Nov 2021 14:11:49 GMT Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20149A405C; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 14:11:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79B61A4054; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 14:11:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sig-9-65-203-91.ibm.com (unknown [9.65.203.91]) by b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 14:11:47 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <3fe1c5f67652af50bf03d40996bd55513a6b56c6.camel@linux.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [RFC v2 0/1]s390/cio: remove uevent suppress from cio driver From: Vineeth Vijayan To: Cornelia Huck , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Cc: oberpar@linux.ibm.com, Eric Farman , Matthew Rosato Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2021 15:11:46 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87a6ilb62b.fsf@redhat.com> References: <20211027085059.544736-1-vneethv@linux.ibm.com> <87lf26bmlq.fsf@redhat.com> <3ab690456a523951ad59c17ac71e6b294ff12d98.camel@linux.ibm.com> <87a6ilb62b.fsf@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 (3.28.5-16.el8) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: KAkBqajbD2hzyiCAwpiLZ4U_u5PsmazG X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: BKi77GknwaVMe5DKfJHCqAe0bmki-JKK X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.790,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.0.607.475 definitions=2021-11-05_02,2021-11-03_01,2020-04-07_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxlogscore=823 impostorscore=0 phishscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1015 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2110150000 definitions=main-2111050081 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2021-11-03 at 16:41 +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > > - interaction with driverctl (and maybe mdevctl) for vfio-ccw > > I have done couple of tests with driverctl. Also, i was wondering if vfio-ccw > > can make use of 'dev_busid' sysfs-interface under each subchannels while writing > > the rules. This is totally different topic, which i do not want to mix up in > > this thread. > > Oh, did not know about that interface. > > > Doesn't the code need to check for 'w' for message subchannels, though? You are right. For the message-subchannels, we need to check 'W'. I will send a fix. Thank you.