From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Hildenbrand Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 9/9] KVM: s390: Inject machine check into the nested guest Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 21:17:49 +0200 Message-ID: <41b84826-c286-4c41-2fe8-300e100ea60b@redhat.com> References: <1498671044-81240-1-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <1498671044-81240-10-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <9ec0f700-c686-44ce-c633-01f2b0ec46c0@redhat.com> <18e00d40-bdd4-84a9-f1b5-d4599aac74af@de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <18e00d40-bdd4-84a9-f1b5-d4599aac74af@de.ibm.com> Content-Language: en-US Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: Christian Borntraeger , Paolo Bonzini , =?UTF-8?B?UmFkaW0gS3LEjW3DocWZ?= Cc: KVM , Cornelia Huck , linux-s390 , QingFeng Hao List-ID: >> As mentioned in the other mail, e.g. vector register validity should >> only be set if vector registers are enabled for the nested guest >> (execution control enabled). > > Yes, but sInce we inject in the base guest (non-nested) we have to check the base guest > execution control. > Right, confusion due to nesting levels strikes again :) -- Thanks, David