From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <46322310.1090000@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 12:21:36 -0400 From: Chuck Ebbert MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [patch 18/38] Improved oops output. References: <20070427140503.087958775@de.ibm.com> <20070427140516.013904506@de.ibm.com> <20070427142506.GA12738@infradead.org> <1177687465.23773.2.camel@localhost> <46321E5E.9010909@redhat.com> <1177690548.23773.13.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1177690548.23773.13.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens List-ID: Martin Schwidefsky wrote: >> No ksymoops for your architecture? > > There is ksymoops for s390 and it should be able to disassemble the code > as well. But you need all sorts of files to feed into ksymoops to get > something out of it. At least I often get bug reports with the console > output attached and it simply saves time if I can see the disassembly > without an extra step. > The only file you need on i386 is the oops itself. ksymoops will scream about missing files but will still work for disassembly.