* Re: [patch 1/3] S390-HWBKPT: Prepare s390 for hardware breakpoint
[not found] <20091214135724.GB21568@in.ibm.com>
@ 2009-12-18 21:56 ` Heiko Carstens
2010-01-04 10:21 ` Mahesh Jagannath Salgaonkar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Heiko Carstens @ 2009-12-18 21:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-s390
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 07:27:24PM +0530, Mahesh Salgaonkar wrote:
> Prepare the s390 code for HW Breakpoint infrastructure patches by including
> relevant constant definitions and function declarations.
Why split this? Especially it would be nice to have function declarations and
the functions in the same patch :)
> Index: linux-2.6-tip/arch/s390/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
> ===================================================================
> --- /dev/null
> +++ linux-2.6-tip/arch/s390/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
> + */
> +#ifndef _S390_HW_BREAKPOINT_H
> +#define _S390_HW_BREAKPOINT_H
> +
> +#ifdef __KERNEL__
This header isn't exported, so the ifdef seems to be unnecessary.
> +#define __ARCH_HW_BREAKPOINT_H
Seems to be unnecessary as well.
> +extern int hw_breakpoint_exceptions_notify(struct notifier_block *unused,
> + unsigned long val, void *data);
> +
> +int arch_install_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp);
> +void arch_uninstall_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp);
> +void hw_breakpoint_pmu_read(struct perf_event *bp);
> +void hw_breakpoint_pmu_unthrottle(struct perf_event *bp);
> +
> +extern void arch_fill_perf_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp);
At least this function doesn't exist in your second patch.
> Index: linux-2.6-tip/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-tip.orig/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> +++ linux-2.6-tip/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,9 @@
> * This file contains the arch-independent routines.
> */
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_S390
> +#include <asm/bitsperlong.h>
> +#endif
Please don't add CONFIG_S390 ifdefs in common code, unless it cannot be
avoided. Why is this needed?
> #include <linux/irqflags.h>
> #include <linux/kallsyms.h>
> #include <linux/notifier.h>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch 1/3] S390-HWBKPT: Prepare s390 for hardware breakpoint
2009-12-18 21:56 ` [patch 1/3] S390-HWBKPT: Prepare s390 for hardware breakpoint Heiko Carstens
@ 2010-01-04 10:21 ` Mahesh Jagannath Salgaonkar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mahesh Jagannath Salgaonkar @ 2010-01-04 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-s390
Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 07:27:24PM +0530, Mahesh Salgaonkar wrote:
>> Prepare the s390 code for HW Breakpoint infrastructure patches by including
>> relevant constant definitions and function declarations.
>
> Why split this? Especially it would be nice to have function declarations and
> the functions in the same patch :)
>
Sure, will merge the first 2 patches.
>> Index: linux-2.6-tip/arch/s390/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
>> ===================================================================
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ linux-2.6-tip/arch/s390/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
>> + */
>> +#ifndef _S390_HW_BREAKPOINT_H
>> +#define _S390_HW_BREAKPOINT_H
>> +
>> +#ifdef __KERNEL__
>
> This header isn't exported, so the ifdef seems to be unnecessary.
>
>> +#define __ARCH_HW_BREAKPOINT_H
>
> Seems to be unnecessary as well.
>
>> +extern int hw_breakpoint_exceptions_notify(struct notifier_block *unused,
>> + unsigned long val, void *data);
>> +
>> +int arch_install_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp);
>> +void arch_uninstall_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp);
>> +void hw_breakpoint_pmu_read(struct perf_event *bp);
>> +void hw_breakpoint_pmu_unthrottle(struct perf_event *bp);
>> +
>> +extern void arch_fill_perf_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp);
>
> At least this function doesn't exist in your second patch.
>
Will remove it.
>> Index: linux-2.6-tip/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux-2.6-tip.orig/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
>> +++ linux-2.6-tip/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
>> @@ -30,6 +30,9 @@
>> * This file contains the arch-independent routines.
>> */
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_S390
>> +#include <asm/bitsperlong.h>
>> +#endif
>
> Please don't add CONFIG_S390 ifdefs in common code, unless it cannot be
> avoided. Why is this needed?
>
>> #include <linux/irqflags.h>
This was included to avoid compilation errors. The 'asm/irqflags.h'
included from 'linux/irqflags' uses "BITS_PER_LONG" #def which is
declared in 'asm/bitsperlong.h'.
>> #include <linux/kallsyms.h>
>> #include <linux/notifier.h>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-01-04 10:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20091214135724.GB21568@in.ibm.com>
2009-12-18 21:56 ` [patch 1/3] S390-HWBKPT: Prepare s390 for hardware breakpoint Heiko Carstens
2010-01-04 10:21 ` Mahesh Jagannath Salgaonkar
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).