From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Raghavendra K T Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] kvm: Improving directed yield in PLE handler Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 17:24:00 +0530 Message-ID: <4FFC17D8.5010108@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20120709062012.24030.37154.sendpatchset@codeblue> <1341870457.2909.27.camel@oc2024037011.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1341870457.2909.27.camel@oc2024037011.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: habanero@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Marcelo Tosatti , Ingo Molnar , Avi Kivity , Rik van Riel , S390 , Carsten Otte , Christian Borntraeger , KVM , chegu vinod , LKML , X86 , Gleb Natapov , linux390@de.ibm.com, Srivatsa Vaddagiri , Joerg Roedel List-ID: On 07/10/2012 03:17 AM, Andrew Theurer wrote: > On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 11:50 +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote: >> Currently Pause Looop Exit (PLE) handler is doing directed yield to a >> random VCPU on PL exit. Though we already have filtering while choosing >> the candidate to yield_to, we can do better. > > Hi, Raghu. > [...] > > Can you briefly explain the 1x and 2x configs? This of course is highly > dependent whether or not HT is enabled... > Sorry if I had not made very clear in earlier threads. Have you applied Rik's following patch for base. without this you could see some inconsistent results perhaps. https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/19/401