From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Raghavendra K T Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V3 2/3] kvm: Note down when cpu relax intercepted or pause loop exited Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 15:41:00 +0530 Message-ID: <4FFFF434.20906@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20120712191712.30440.68944.sendpatchset@codeblue> <20120712191800.30440.16406.sendpatchset@codeblue> <4FFF2D5F.3050902@de.ibm.com> <4FFF979F.8070100@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4FFFBC9A.6080107@de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4FFFBC9A.6080107@de.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: Christian Borntraeger Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Marcelo Tosatti , Ingo Molnar , Avi Kivity , Rik van Riel , S390 , Carsten Otte , KVM , chegu vinod , "Andrew M. Theurer" , LKML , X86 , Gleb Natapov , linux390@de.ibm.com, Srivatsa Vaddagiri , Joerg Roedel List-ID: On 07/13/2012 11:43 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > On 13/07/12 05:35, Raghavendra K T wrote: >>> maybe define static inline access functions in kvm_host.h that are no-ops >>> if CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_CPU_RELAX_INTERCEPT is not set. > > As I already said, can you have a look at using access functions? Yes. will do.