From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V5 0/3] kvm: Improving directed yield in PLE handler Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 15:43:49 +0300 Message-ID: <500BF585.2080109@redhat.com> References: <20120718133717.5321.71347.sendpatchset@codeblue.in.ibm.com> <20120720173640.GA22659@amt.cnet> <500BF35D.6050605@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <500BF35D.6050605@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: Raghavendra K T Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , Rik van Riel , Christian Borntraeger , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Srikar , S390 , Carsten Otte , KVM , chegu vinod , "Andrew M. Theurer" , LKML , X86 , Gleb Natapov , linux390@de.ibm.com, Srivatsa Vaddagiri , Joerg Roedel List-ID: On 07/22/2012 03:34 PM, Raghavendra K T wrote: > > Thanks Marcelo for the review. Avi, Rik, Christian, please let me know > if this series looks good now. > It looks fine to me. Christian, is this okay for s390? -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function