From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christian Borntraeger Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] s390/kvm fixes Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 21:41:21 +0100 Message-ID: <510833F1.2000200@de.ibm.com> References: <1359124457-51126-1-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <20130129131202.GC15004@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130129131202.GC15004@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: Gleb Natapov Cc: Marcelo Tossati , Alexander Graf , Jens Freimann , Cornelia Huck , Heiko Carstens , Martin Schwidefsky , KVM , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 29/01/13 14:12, Gleb Natapov wrote: > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 03:34:14PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >> Gleb, Marcelo, >> > Alex, can you review? Last time I checked, Cornelia and myself were s390/kvm/kernel maintainers ;-) Alex is maintainer for s390/kvm/qemu. If the patch introduces or touched an kernel<->qemu interface, I usually try to come to a conclusion with Alex before submission, but these patches are only bugfixes and Alex is probably pretty busy working the last day before qemus hard freeze for 1.4. Christian