linux-s390.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@minantech.com>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
	Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
	Jens Freimann <jfrei@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	agraf@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm/irqchip: Speed up KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 12:24:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52D7C186.1070700@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1389864219-47412-1-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com>

Il 16/01/2014 10:23, Christian Borntraeger ha scritto:
> When starting lots of dataplane devices the bootup takes very long on my
> s390 system(prototype irqfd code). With larger setups we are even able to
> trigger some timeouts in some components.
> Turns out that the KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING ioctl takes very
> long (strace claims up to 0.1 sec) when having multiple CPUs.
> This is caused by the  synchronize_rcu and the HZ=100 of s390.
> We can defer the freeing outside of the ioctl path by using kfree_rcu.
> 
> Please note that we now have to check for a NULL pointer, since
> the underlying call_rcu in kfree_rcu cannot handle broken rcu
> callbacks.
> 
> This patch reduces the boot time till mounting root from 8 to 2 seconds
> on my s390 guest with 100 disks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>

Hi Christian,

please take a look at the thread at
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel/116933 - uses
of call_rcu need to be rate limited, otherwise the guest can allocate
arbitrarily large amounts of memory.

Can you check if using a dedicated SRCU (possibly with
synchronize_srcu_expedited in kvm_set_irq_routing) speeds up
KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING enough?  Back-of-the-envelope, the latency should be
on the order of tens of microseconds.

Thanks,

Paolo

> ---
>  include/linux/kvm_host.h | 1 +
>  virt/kvm/irqchip.c       | 5 ++---
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> index 3d1b0e6..2f19079 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> @@ -327,6 +327,7 @@ struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQ_ROUTING
>  
>  struct kvm_irq_routing_table {
> +	struct rcu_head	rcu;
>  	int chip[KVM_NR_IRQCHIPS][KVM_IRQCHIP_NUM_PINS];
>  	struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *rt_entries;
>  	u32 nr_rt_entries;
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/irqchip.c b/virt/kvm/irqchip.c
> index 20dc9e4..3e2ebed 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/irqchip.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/irqchip.c
> @@ -226,12 +226,11 @@ int kvm_set_irq_routing(struct kvm *kvm,
>  	kvm_irq_routing_update(kvm, new);
>  	mutex_unlock(&kvm->irq_lock);
>  
> -	synchronize_rcu();
> -
>  	new = old;
>  	r = 0;
>  
>  out:
> -	kfree(new);
> +	if (new)
> +		kfree_rcu(new, rcu);
>  	return r;
>  }
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-16 11:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-16  9:23 [PATCH] kvm/irqchip: Speed up KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING Christian Borntraeger
2014-01-16 11:24 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2014-01-16 12:44   ` [PATCHv2/RFC] " Christian Borntraeger
2014-01-16 12:59     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-01-16 13:06       ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-01-16 13:07         ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-01-16 18:56           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-01-17  8:29             ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-01-17  9:19               ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-02-19 22:23               ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-02-21  4:59                 ` Andrew Theurer
2014-01-16 18:55     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-01-16 20:07       ` [PATCHv3] " Christian Borntraeger
2014-01-16 20:22         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-01-17 14:03           ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-01-17 15:03             ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-01-17 15:26               ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-02-21 17:35     ` [PATCHv2/RFC] " Paolo Bonzini
2014-02-24 11:58       ` [PATCHv2] " Christian Borntraeger
2014-02-24 12:02         ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52D7C186.1070700@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=gleb@minantech.com \
    --cc=jfrei@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).