From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 8/9] KVM: s390: advertise KVM_CAP_S390_IRQCHIP Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 10:32:12 +0200 Message-ID: <53CE218C.5020505@redhat.com> References: <1405970065-3740-1-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <1405970065-3740-9-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1405970065-3740-9-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: Christian Borntraeger Cc: Alexander Graf , KVM , linux-s390 , Cornelia Huck , Jens Freimann List-ID: Il 21/07/2014 21:14, Christian Borntraeger ha scritto: > From: Cornelia Huck > > We should advertise all capabilities, including those that can > be enabled. > > Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck > Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger > Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger > --- > arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c > index dd902e6..339b34a 100644 > --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c > +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c > @@ -166,6 +166,7 @@ int kvm_dev_ioctl_check_extension(long ext) > case KVM_CAP_IOEVENTFD: > case KVM_CAP_DEVICE_CTRL: > case KVM_CAP_ENABLE_CAP_VM: > + case KVM_CAP_S390_IRQCHIP: > case KVM_CAP_VM_ATTRIBUTES: > case KVM_CAP_MP_STATE: > r = 1; > Should I apply this to 3.16 as well (or Cc: stable)?