From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yijing Wang Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/22] PCI/MSI: Clean up struct msi_chip argument Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 10:15:48 +0800 Message-ID: <5424CC54.1040507@huawei.com> References: <1411614872-4009-1-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com> <1411614872-4009-2-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com> <20140925071536.GG12423@ulmo> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: sparclinux-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: Thomas Gleixner , Thierry Reding Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Xinwei Hu , Wuyun , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Russell King , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, arnab.basu@freescale.com, Bharat.Bhushan@freescale.com, x86@kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Joerg Roedel , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Benjamin Herrenschmidt , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Sebastian Ott , Tony Luck , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Chris Metcalf List-ID: On 2014/9/25 18:20, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Thu, 25 Sep 2014, Thierry Reding wrote: > >> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:14:11AM +0800, Yijing Wang wrote: >>> Msi_chip functions setup_irq/teardown_irq rarely use msi_chip >>> argument. >> >> That's not true. Out of the four drivers that you modify two use the >> parameter. And the two that don't probably should be using it too. >> >> 50% is not "rarely". =) >> >>> We can look up msi_chip pointer by the device pointer >>> or irq number, so clean up msi_chip argument. >> >> I don't like this particular change. The idea was to keep the API object >> oriented so that drivers wouldn't have to know where to get the MSI chip >> from. It also makes it more resilient against code reorganizations since >> the core code is the only place that needs to know where to get the chip >> from. > > Right. We have the same thing in the irq_chip callbacks. All of them > take "struct irq_data", because it's already available in the core > code and it gives easy access to all information (chip, chipdata ...) > which is necessary for the callback implementations. OK, I will drop this change, tglx, thanks for your review and comments! Thanks! Yijing. > > Thanks, > > tglx > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > . > -- Thanks! Yijing