From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christian Borntraeger Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] s390/kernel: Update /proc/sysinfo file with Extended Name and UUID Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 14:01:31 +0100 Message-ID: <54D2182B.9090800@de.ibm.com> References: <1423043092-34044-1-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <1423043092-34044-4-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <54D21757.7020300@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <54D21757.7020300@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: KVM , Cornelia Huck , Jens Freimann , linux-s390 , Alexander Graf , Ekaterina Tumanova List-ID: Am 04.02.2015 um 13:57 schrieb Paolo Bonzini: > > > On 04/02/2015 10:44, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >> From: Ekaterina Tumanova >> >> Read the additional data fields (Extended Name and UUID) from the >> 1KB block returned by the STSI command and reflect this information in >> the /proc/sysinfo file accordingly >> >> Signed-off-by: Ekaterina Tumanova >> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand >> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck >> Acked-by: Heiko Carstens >> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger > > Why should this go in via KVM? :) Because we are being the first that will implement the architecture ( the other side so to speak). Heiko gave his ack so this shoudl be fine. If you prefer I can certainly push that via Martin/Heiko. Christian