From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM: s390: fixes and features for kvm/next (3.20)
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 14:03:02 +0100
Message-ID: <54D21886.8090001@redhat.com>
References: <1423043092-34044-1-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1423043092-34044-1-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Archive: <https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/>
List-Post: <mailto:kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>, Jens Freimann <jfrei@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
List-ID: <linux-s390.vger.kernel.org>



On 04/02/2015 10:44, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> here is my remaining bunch of patches for 3.20 for review. All patches
> have been in linux-next via
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvms390/linux.git next
> (well a tiny fix went in today, so the commit id for the last 3 patches
> has changed)
> 
> I think it makes sense to give some of these patches some more days
> for external review. Is it ok to send a pull request early next week
> or do you want it before 3.19?

No problem, I have been a bit late myself so I don't plan to send a 3.20
pull request earlier than Wednesday or Thursday.

Paolo