From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christian Borntraeger Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] s390/kernel: Update /proc/sysinfo file with Extended Name and UUID Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 20:32:04 +0100 Message-ID: <54D273B4.1080009@de.ibm.com> References: <1423043092-34044-1-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <1423043092-34044-4-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <54D21757.7020300@redhat.com> <54D2182B.9090800@de.ibm.com> <54D218B8.7050201@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <54D218B8.7050201@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: KVM , Cornelia Huck , Jens Freimann , linux-s390 , Alexander Graf , Ekaterina Tumanova List-ID: Am 04.02.2015 um 14:03 schrieb Paolo Bonzini: > > > On 04/02/2015 14:01, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >> Am 04.02.2015 um 13:57 schrieb Paolo Bonzini: >>> >>> >>> On 04/02/2015 10:44, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >>>> From: Ekaterina Tumanova >>>> >>>> Read the additional data fields (Extended Name and UUID) from the >>>> 1KB block returned by the STSI command and reflect this information in >>>> the /proc/sysinfo file accordingly >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Ekaterina Tumanova >>>> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand >>>> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck >>>> Acked-by: Heiko Carstens >>>> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger >>> >>> Why should this go in via KVM? :) >> >> Because we are being the first that will implement the architecture ( >> the other side so to speak). >> Heiko gave his ack so this shoudl be fine. If you prefer I can certainly push >> that via Martin/Heiko. > > No problem. Perhaps edit the commit message? Something like A new architecture extends STSI 3.2.2 with UUID and long names. KVM will provide the first implementation. This patch adds the additional data fields (Extended Name and UUID) from the 4KB block returned by the STSI 3.2.2 command and reflect this information in the /proc/sysinfo file accordingly. This is is non-KVM code, but developed by the KVM team. The patch is acked by Heiko Carstens to go over the KVM tree. Signed-off-by: Ekaterina Tumanova Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck Acked-by: Heiko Carstens Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger ?