From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christian Borntraeger Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Preview: vcpu lookup by id changes Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 10:51:11 +0100 Message-ID: <564D9B8F.2070703@de.ibm.com> References: <1447922251-54261-1-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <564D98AA.70909@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <564D98AA.70909@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: Paolo Bonzini , Alexander Graf , Paul Mackerras , David Hildenbrand Cc: KVM , Cornelia Huck , Jens Freimann , linux-s390 , kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 11/19/2015 10:38 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 19/11/2015 09:37, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >> >> some more patches for review before I add them in my next pull request. >> Can you review the common code changes and Ack/Nack? >> >> Alex, Paul, >> can you review the power changes and Ack/Nack? >> >> As I want to have patch 2 in 4.4, I splitted up Davids patch into smaller >> chunks. David, can you double check that I did not mess up? >> So I want to send patch 1 and patch 2 for 4.4. Patch 3 and Patch 4 >> are for kvm/next (4.5), but need patch 1 as well. >> So I will probably also add all patches into kvm/next by setting up >> the git branches in a way that during 4.5 merge window kvm/next will >> have my branch that will go via kvm/master as common ancestor. >> >> Ok? > > Patches and plan both look good! > > I can apply patch 1 and 2 now to kvm/master. By the time kvm/next forks > from Linus's tree (sometime next week, since kvm/queue is already > largish) they will be in. I have 2or 3 more patches for 4.4 and I will prepare a pull request today. So either take them or wait for my request. Whatever works best for you.