From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 390/qeth: Delete an unnecessary variable initialisation in
 qeth_core_set_online()
References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net>
 <5688F13A.70601@users.sourceforge.net>
 <5688F198.4040109@users.sourceforge.net>
 <1452177226.1081.6.camel@BR9GV9YG.de.ibm.com>
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <568F62D0.9050806@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 08:18:40 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1452177226.1081.6.camel@BR9GV9YG.de.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Archive: <https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
To: Ursula Braun <ubraun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>, Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
List-ID: <linux-s390.vger.kernel.org>

> As Heiko already answered, you could propose a lot of this kind of changes
> with just minor benefit. I do not want to push them in single patches.

Thanks for your clarification.


> Either there is a cleanup patch for explicit initialisation of
> local variables in the whole qeth driver,

Is there any more fine-tuning cooking in the background?


> or we take care about such minor changes, once we touch the code anyway

How often will this really happen?


> due to other reasons.

I am curious which ones will trigger further related software improvements.

Regards,
Markus