From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] KVM: selftests: Guard struct kvm_vcpu_events with __KVM_HAVE_VCPU_EVENTS References: <20190516111253.4494-1-thuth@redhat.com> <20190516111253.4494-2-thuth@redhat.com> <8fda58ac-0e0c-6576-f492-2a9f9d2a3194@redhat.com> From: Christian Borntraeger Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 10:13:03 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8fda58ac-0e0c-6576-f492-2a9f9d2a3194@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <6473259f-37de-bd0a-2733-c951f901b048@de.ibm.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: Thomas Huth , Janosch Frank , kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: Paolo Bonzini , =?UTF-8?B?UmFkaW0gS3LEjW3DocWZ?= , Shuah Khan , David Hildenbrand , Cornelia Huck , Andrew Jones , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 20.05.19 10:08, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 20/05/2019 09.12, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >> >> On 16.05.19 13:12, Thomas Huth wrote: >>> The struct kvm_vcpu_events code is only available on certain architectures >>> (arm, arm64 and x86). To be able to compile kvm_util.c also for other >>> architectures, we've got to fence the code with __KVM_HAVE_VCPU_EVENTS. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth >> Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger >> >> According to the MAINTAINERS patches, you want me to pick these patches. Correct? > > That would be nice, yes. But if you don't want to be responsible for > s390x-related KVM selftest patches, please let me know, then I'll drop > these hunks from the patches again. I can take care of these (as part of the normal KVM maintainership).