From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:26032 "EHLO mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726171AbgKYIwF (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Nov 2020 03:52:05 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] s390/uaccess: remove set_fs() interface References: <20200915154340.4215-1-hca@linux.ibm.com> <20200915154340.4215-5-hca@linux.ibm.com> <20200915160243.GB22056@lst.de> <20200915193755.GA8528@osiris> <20200916123603.GC7076@osiris> <20201125083808.GB31753@lst.de> From: Christian Borntraeger Message-ID: <72753cc5-e9a9-05c5-c465-6dff9fcf679d@de.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 09:51:47 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20201125083808.GB31753@lst.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 List-ID: To: Christoph Hellwig , Heiko Carstens Cc: Vasily Gorbik , Harald Freudenberger , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org On 25.11.20 09:38, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 02:36:03PM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote: >> So, I can think of several ways to fix this (or better: make this >> robust). However given that I will be away the next two weeks this is >> not going to happen for the upcoming merge window. I really don't want >> to rush this, since this has potential for severe subtle bugs... like >> we had them already several times with our address space and dynamic >> page table upgrade handling in the past (and like I nearly introduced >> at least one bug with this patch). >> >> Therefore the first three patches of this series are scheduled for the >> upcoming merge window, while the final set_fs() removal should come >> one merge later. > > Did you manage to get back to the s390 set_fs removal? > Heiko has queued the following: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux.git/commit/?h=features&id=87d5986345219a7e4f204726d9085ea87f3e22d0