From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.81]:37446 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729192AbgGOIgX (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jul 2020 04:36:23 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/2] s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features References: <1594801869-13365-1-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com> From: Jason Wang Message-ID: <73459586-3315-44cf-8d82-13a394bdf115@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 16:36:10 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1594801869-13365-1-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-s390-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Pierre Morel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: pasic@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com, mst@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, thomas.lendacky@amd.com, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au, linuxram@us.ibm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com On 2020/7/15 下午4:31, Pierre Morel wrote: > Hi all, > > The goal of the series is to give a chance to the architecture > to validate VIRTIO device features. > > in this respin: > > 1) I kept removed the ack from Jason as I reworked the patch > @Jason, the nature and goal of the patch did not really changed > please can I get back your acked-by with these changes? Yes. Acked-by: Jason Wang Thanks > > 2) Rewording for warning messages > > Regards, > Pierre > > Pierre Morel (2): > virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features > s390: virtio: PV needs VIRTIO I/O device protection > > arch/s390/mm/init.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ > include/linux/virtio_config.h | 1 + > 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+) >