From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Farman Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] vfio-ccw: support hsch/csch (kernel part) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 12:37:23 -0500 Message-ID: <75c1f24b-204d-d464-8466-8453f7a0f89c@linux.ibm.com> References: <20190130132212.7376-1-cohuck@redhat.com> <20190206150016.6fdfaf8f.cohuck@redhat.com> <1981d9bc-e950-62ef-d2d2-66a17771c8f4@linux.ibm.com> <20190211171354.40be0856.cohuck@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20190211171354.40be0856.cohuck@redhat.com> Content-Language: en-US List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel2=m.gmane.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" List-Archive: List-Post: To: Cornelia Huck Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Alex Williamson , Pierre Morel , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Farhan Ali , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Halil Pasic , qemu-s390x@nongnu.org List-ID: On 02/11/2019 11:13 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Fri, 8 Feb 2019 16:19:58 -0500 > Eric Farman wrote: >> >> FWIW, I've been running with both series for the last week or two, along >> with some host kernel traces to prove things got executed the way I >> thought, and it's seemed to be working well. So that makes me >> optimistic for the later patches. > > That's good news, thanks for testing. Do you have a special test load > that you run in the guest that you can share? > Not really. Lately it's just fio, run via some ancient scripts which randomize the input parameters and distill the output data. If I get some time to make it less hack-y it might be worth sharing, but right now there's more things commented out than actual script. :) - Eric