From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 09:07:01 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] vfio: ccw: Merge BUSY and BOXED states
Message-Id: <826ab960-e2eb-7e2c-e6d6-7a67c7f878ae@linux.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <497c99a6-4c06-ea3f-d766-6674afa461f1@linux.ibm.com>
References: <497c99a6-4c06-ea3f-d766-6674afa461f1@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-s390.vger.kernel.org>

On 26/11/2018 15:53, Eric Farman wrote:
> 
> 
> On 11/19/2018 06:30 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>> On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 11:18:39 +0200
>> Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>> FWIW, I've created a new vfio-ccw-staging branch where I plan to
>> collect patches prior to putting together a pull request. (I assume I'm
>> still the only vfio-ccw maintainer with a kernel.org account, right?)
> 
> So far as I know.� I can ask around here and see if that should change.
> 
>> The idea is that this branch can collect patches that are fine but are
>> targeted to a later release (fixes would still go via the normal
>> vfio-ccw branch.) Let me know whether that sounds reasonable.
> 
> This sounds fine to me.� Thank you!
> 
>  �- Eric
> 

Forgot to answer but already using your branch.

Thanks,
Pierre

-- 
Pierre Morel
Linux/KVM/QEMU in B�blingen - Germany