From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rusty Russell Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] virtio-spec: Add virtio-ccw spec. Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 11:56:31 +0930 Message-ID: <87ehmfj38o.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> References: <1346771641-12136-1-git-send-email-cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> <1346771641-12136-2-git-send-email-cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1346771641-12136-2-git-send-email-cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: Cornelia Huck , KVM , linux-s390 , qemu-devel Cc: Carsten Otte , Anthony Liguori , Sebastian Ott , Marcelo Tosatti , Heiko Carstens , Alexander Graf , Christian Borntraeger , Avi Kivity , Martin Schwidefsky List-ID: Cornelia Huck writes: > Add specifications for the new s390 specific virtio-ccw transport. > > Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck Excellent. I have applied and pushed this revision. I was tempted to ask for an explicit endian marker, as switching to explicit little endian was high on the TODO list for virtio2. On the other hand, we could say virtio2-pci config space is always little-endian, and virtio-ccw config space is always big-endian. That covers the config endian, and and if we introduce a new ring format, that endian debate can be separate. Cheers, Rusty.