Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] x86, kvm: support vcpu preempted check

Pan Xinhui
2016-10-25T01:25:37Z

在 2016/10/24 23:18, Paolo Bonzini 写道:
>
>
> On 24/10/2016 17:14, Radim Krčmář wrote:
>> 2016-10-24 16:39+0200, Paolo Bonzini:
>>> On 19/10/2016 19:24, Radim Krčmář wrote:
>>>>>> + if (vcpu->arch.st.msr_val & KVM_MSR_ENABLED)
>>>>>> + if (kvm_read_guest_cached(vcpu->kvm, &vcpu->arch.st.stime,
>>>>>> + &vcpu->arch.st.steal,
>>>>>> + sizeof(struct kvm_steal_time)) == 0) {
>>>>>> + vcpu->arch.st.steal.preempted = 1;
>>>>>> + kvm_write_guest_cached(vcpu->kvm, &vcpu->arch.st.stime,
>>>>>> + &vcpu->arch.st.steal,
>>>>>> + sizeof(struct kvm_steal_time));
>>>>>> + }
>>>> Please name this block of code. Something like
>>>> kvm_steal_time_set_preempted(vcpu);
>>>
>>> While at it:
>>>
>>> 1) the kvm_read_guest_cached is not necessary. You can rig the call to
>>> kvm_write_guest_cached so that it only writes vcpu->arch.st.steal.preempted.
>>
>> I agree. kvm_write_guest_cached() always writes from offset 0, so we'd
>> want a new function that allows to specify a starting offset.
>
> Yeah, let's leave it for a follow-up then!
>
I think I can make a having-offset version. :)

> Thanks,
>
> Paolo
>
>> Using cached vcpu->arch.st.steal to avoid the read wouldn't be as good.
>>
>

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org