From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 11/13] KVM: s390: implement mediated device open
 callback
Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 11:08:23 +0200
Message-ID: <93cd0f46-a410-51c8-00b9-810c1b3d3ae2@linux.ibm.com>
References: <1525705912-12815-1-git-send-email-akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <1525705912-12815-12-git-send-email-akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <98ea7ce2-2539-e2ff-4bb4-297e784d87bd@linux.ibm.com>
 <7bb480ac-5723-83ff-c797-53c1ab0458c1@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reply-To: pmorel@linux.ibm.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <7bb480ac-5723-83ff-c797-53c1ab0458c1@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Archive: <https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/>
List-Post: <mailto:kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: freude@de.ibm.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, cohuck@redhat.com, kwankhede@nvidia.com, bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com, alifm@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mjrosato@linux.vnet.ibm.com, jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com, thuth@redhat.com, pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com, berrange@redhat.com, fiuczy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, buendgen@de.ibm.com
List-ID: <linux-s390.vger.kernel.org>

On 23/05/2018 16:45, Tony Krowiak wrote:
> On 05/16/2018 04:03 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
>> On 07/05/2018 17:11, Tony Krowiak wrote:
>>> Implements the open callback on the mediated matrix device.
>>> The function registers a group notifier to receive notification
>>> of the VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY_SET_KVM event. When notified,
>>> the vfio_ap device driver will get access to the guest's
>>> kvm structure. With access to this structure the driver will:
>>>
>>> 1. Ensure that only one mediated device is opened for the guest

You should explain why.

>>>
>>> 2. Configure access to the AP devices for the guest.
>>>
...snip...
>>> +void kvm_ap_refcount_inc(struct kvm *kvm)
>>> +{
>>> +    atomic_inc(&kvm->arch.crypto.aprefs);
>>> +}
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(kvm_ap_refcount_inc);
>>> +
>>> +void kvm_ap_refcount_dec(struct kvm *kvm)
>>> +{
>>> +    atomic_dec(&kvm->arch.crypto.aprefs);
>>> +}
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(kvm_ap_refcount_dec);
>>
>> Why are these functions inside kvm-ap ?
>> Will anyone use this outer of vfio-ap ?
>
> As I've stated before, I made the choice to contain all interfaces that
> access KVM in kvm-ap because I don't think it is appropriate for the 
> device
> driver to have to have "knowledge" of the inner workings of KVM. Why does
> it matter whether any entity outside of the vfio_ap device driver calls
> these functions? I could ask a similar question if the interfaces were
> contained in vfio-ap; what if another device driver needs access to these
> interfaces?

This is very driver specific and only used during initialization.
It is not a common property of the cryptographic interface.

I really think you should handle this inside the driver.

Pierre


...snip...


-- 
Pierre Morel
Linux/KVM/QEMU in Böblingen - Germany