From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8789A30DD22; Tue, 16 Dec 2025 09:17:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765876627; cv=none; b=UWyu4vQubqcrMjZRz5kj8vYRO8jjpqwH/Odc8H9zDOxHcdMvT4UgzaHwR1fkDFh4EYfUf+aIIoWzK2uI+ckpL1TlomREjeVTvMygtYfEtMLIKljQBp0JvKRL3Q6HVjEFxrb9+pzyZl2cGlK7tH7KBYcJ3wjjORzbylEBmnHDqHE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765876627; c=relaxed/simple; bh=sy1h3UIGBeG2MMT25lIycWl3qhGlqb0+xamWgNDUFNk=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=cbaoB7mJ/igIPfI3GE6NhHOxkM19nhiTopOt501DQ/rsvbsLhXG76wkqoxyNmAUPbbd1hRPTY7+kobCYAs6aKR4kYj9Cwgut7KBqltuj0CYtqoIFhGBQXwX//253D5AQOytbwFzhbFrq7GW49zxczqZrddXB9jtSoaVhXhHgTqk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6985FEC; Tue, 16 Dec 2025 01:16:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.57.91.77] (unknown [10.57.91.77]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E956C3F73B; Tue, 16 Dec 2025 01:16:59 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <9ae8655f-e537-43bb-ae0e-3067d2481d79@arm.com> Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2025 09:16:58 +0000 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] randomize_kstack: Unify random source across arches Content-Language: en-GB To: Ard Biesheuvel , Kees Cook Cc: Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Huacai Chen , Madhavan Srinivasan , Michael Ellerman , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Heiko Carstens , Vasily Gorbik , Alexander Gordeev , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , "Gustavo A. R. Silva" , Arnd Bergmann , Mark Rutland , "Jason A. Donenfeld" , Jeremy Linton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org References: <20251215163520.1144179-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com> <20251215163520.1144179-4-ryan.roberts@arm.com> <202512160024.B688A8D0@keescook> From: Ryan Roberts In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 16/12/2025 08:30, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On Tue, 16 Dec 2025 at 09:27, Kees Cook wrote: >> >> On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 04:35:17PM +0000, Ryan Roberts wrote: >>> [...] >>> @@ -45,9 +46,22 @@ DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_MAYBE(CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_KSTACK_OFFSET_DEFAULT, >>> #define KSTACK_OFFSET_MAX(x) ((x) & 0b1111111100) >>> #endif >>> >>> +DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct rnd_state, kstack_rnd_state); >>> + >>> +static __always_inline u32 get_kstack_offset(void) >>> +{ >>> + struct rnd_state *state; >>> + u32 rnd; >>> + >>> + state = &get_cpu_var(kstack_rnd_state); >>> + rnd = prandom_u32_state(state); >>> + put_cpu_var(kstack_rnd_state); >>> + >>> + return rnd; >>> +} >>> [...] >>> -static inline void random_kstack_task_init(struct task_struct *tsk) >>> +static int random_kstack_init(void) >>> { >>> - tsk->kstack_offset = 0; >>> + prandom_seed_full_state(&kstack_rnd_state); >>> + return 0; >>> } >>> + >>> +late_initcall(random_kstack_init); >> >> Doesn't this need to be run for every CPU? (And how does hotplug work >> for such things?) And doesn't it need a get_cpu_var? >> > > > prandom_seed_full_state() takes a 'struct rnd_state __percpu > *pcpu_state', and performs the initialization for all possible CPUs. Yes, indeed, prandom_seed_full_state() is initializing all possible CPUs so it doesn't matter if it gets migrated. I believe this is correct as is. void prandom_seed_full_state(struct rnd_state __percpu *pcpu_state) { int i; for_each_possible_cpu(i) { struct rnd_state *state = per_cpu_ptr(pcpu_state, i); u32 seeds[4]; get_random_bytes(&seeds, sizeof(seeds)); state->s1 = __seed(seeds[0], 2U); state->s2 = __seed(seeds[1], 8U); state->s3 = __seed(seeds[2], 16U); state->s4 = __seed(seeds[3], 128U); prandom_warmup(state); } }