linux-s390.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: <joro@8bytes.org>, <jgg@nvidia.com>, <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>, <will@kernel.org>,
	<robin.murphy@arm.com>, <sven@kernel.org>, <j@jannau.net>,
	<alyssa@rosenzweig.io>, <neal@gompa.dev>,
	<robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com>, <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	<krzk@kernel.org>, <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
	<dwmw2@infradead.org>, <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
	<kevin.tian@intel.com>, <yong.wu@mediatek.com>,
	<matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
	<tjeznach@rivosinc.com>, <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	<palmer@dabbelt.com>, <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, <alex@ghiti.fr>,
	<heiko@sntech.de>, <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>,
	<mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>, <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>,
	<orsonzhai@gmail.com>, <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	<zhang.lyra@gmail.com>, <wens@csie.org>,
	<jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>, <samuel@sholland.org>,
	<jean-philippe@linaro.org>, <rafael@kernel.org>,
	<lenb@kernel.org>, <yi.l.liu@intel.com>, <cwabbott0@gmail.com>,
	<quic_pbrahma@quicinc.com>, <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <asahi@lists.linux.dev>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev>,
	<linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>, <virtualization@lists.linux.dev>,
	<linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	<patches@lists.linux.dev>, <vsethi@nvidia.com>,
	<helgaas@kernel.org>, <etzhao1900@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/7] iommu: Lock group->mutex in iommu_deferred_attach()
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2025 16:31:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9b9199e03c87c3cf8152cf93dc403a95c883811b.1756682135.git.nicolinc@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1756682135.git.nicolinc@nvidia.com>

The iommu_deferred_attach() function invokes __iommu_attach_device() while
not holding the group->mutex, like other __iommu_attach_device() callers.

Though there is no pratical bug being triggered so far, it would be better
to apply the same locking to this __iommu_attach_device(), since the IOMMU
drivers nowaday are more aware of the group->mutex -- some of them use the
iommu_group_mutex_assert() function that could be potentially in the path
of an attach_dev callback function invoked by the __iommu_attach_device().

The iommu_deferred_attach() will soon need to verify a new flag stored in
the struct group_device. To iterate the gdev list, the group->mutex should
be held for this matter too.

So, grab the mutex to guard __iommu_attach_device() like other callers.

Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 13 ++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
index 060ebe330ee16..1e0116bce0762 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
@@ -2144,10 +2144,17 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_attach_device);
 
 int iommu_deferred_attach(struct device *dev, struct iommu_domain *domain)
 {
-	if (dev->iommu && dev->iommu->attach_deferred)
-		return __iommu_attach_device(domain, dev);
+	/*
+	 * This is called on the dma mapping fast path so avoid locking. This is
+	 * racy, but we have an expectation that the driver will setup its DMAs
+	 * inside probe while being single threaded to avoid racing.
+	 */
+	if (!dev->iommu || !dev->iommu->attach_deferred)
+		return 0;
 
-	return 0;
+	guard(mutex)(&dev->iommu_group->mutex);
+
+	return __iommu_attach_device(domain, dev);
 }
 
 void iommu_detach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-08-31 23:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-31 23:31 [PATCH v4 0/7] Disable ATS via iommu during PCI resets Nicolin Chen
2025-08-31 23:31 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add release_domain to attach prior to release_dev() Nicolin Chen
2025-08-31 23:31 ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2025-08-31 23:31 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] iommu: Pass in gdev to __iommu_device_set_domain Nicolin Chen
2025-08-31 23:31 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] iommu: Pass in old domain to attach_dev callback functions Nicolin Chen
2025-08-31 23:31 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] iommu: Add iommu_get_domain_for_dev_locked() helper Nicolin Chen
2025-08-31 23:31 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] iommu: Introduce iommu_dev_reset_prepare() and iommu_dev_reset_done() Nicolin Chen
2025-08-31 23:31 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] pci: Suspend iommu function prior to resetting a device Nicolin Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9b9199e03c87c3cf8152cf93dc403a95c883811b.1756682135.git.nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --to=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
    --cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
    --cc=alyssa@rosenzweig.io \
    --cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=asahi@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=cwabbott0@gmail.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=etzhao1900@gmail.com \
    --cc=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=j@jannau.net \
    --cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
    --cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=neal@gompa.dev \
    --cc=orsonzhai@gmail.com \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=quic_pbrahma@quicinc.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=samuel@sholland.org \
    --cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=sven@kernel.org \
    --cc=tjeznach@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=wens@csie.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=yong.wu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=zhang.lyra@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).