From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 091F2219317; Fri, 6 Jun 2025 08:48:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.158.5 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749199711; cv=none; b=XIKmTR18BgGoRbW9TkKTZzlc49NNn4Wx6L1vieOAnS9q9cgnbqmaR15QM3CGB4j6zT2FCn23TLrG+YcrT/hjta0IvULPZJ5rqAfSRYdf7rmr57KjyiN6uYS4Hh/+tQgNy9WXaVDRspuqtGOdt5H9PFnqT4F7zUYduxq74UTl8GY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749199711; c=relaxed/simple; bh=EzSOvL1yin7qcG8YaPOT04MSTiEZWpFOybwDAE+Kl4s=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:To:Subject:From:Cc: References:In-Reply-To; b=PoTUnb21Bx6B7oS8tDkbvIQ/bBQCG6ma1l7ShwauoSWgCQD4mOhZYQlRVyrt2mwDIV/s9wpBnSKGfsxKpujxev4T+Bk4G0ab5PSdGjJzHO5FXGoX31knmx9hvHnyX/Azx3Pc3JgC1xCJGYpzaxPjCQscPyoDd38K8Qr4FDYUjjk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b=HKCghDeL; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.158.5 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b="HKCghDeL" Received: from pps.filterd (m0353725.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 5563j6Lb004261; Fri, 6 Jun 2025 08:48:27 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to; s=pp1; bh=EzSOvL 1yin7qcG8YaPOT04MSTiEZWpFOybwDAE+Kl4s=; b=HKCghDeLLyX1cyBU8mx0gr KtJT95ZZFOo4fyOlhhGovqbl2HqchzBOuYxUmNMYZz9XU1nd2k4kSvPtlPr32X/g mjhi2BVkcuOAfHbbUnZP1PpZjkmwb8IAYpLkkxHcW69lX5GcWV0+U+2NhqnEscwZ Wt4PwGRdSpz5Q7ZVAFAIw4b87VqJY/cdmiIWDOnSKUDiGDxdAEpK5rlSXajvKy3U Pmlj1Go9qIhqGCnkzmQcvDhy5SIx8S+o4yRcImRn3hb6XFS9qaAuhdpKQdZjAT6R tZ/QrXrRYE1p9/yeorVGy3/4ueE0RTB/M4JWc4igWJhwNbGtl9TB9x/TRhEkjegg == Received: from ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (5b.69.3da9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.61.105.91]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 47332yq1ng-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 06 Jun 2025 08:48:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pps.filterd (ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 5567CmKR019886; Fri, 6 Jun 2025 08:48:26 GMT Received: from smtprelay03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.224]) by ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 470d3p8nth-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 06 Jun 2025 08:48:26 +0000 Received: from smtpav02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.101]) by smtprelay03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 5568mMDg58393080 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 6 Jun 2025 08:48:22 GMT Received: from smtpav02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78F9D20043; Fri, 6 Jun 2025 08:48:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B3D320040; Fri, 6 Jun 2025 08:48:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from darkmoore (unknown [9.111.92.69]) by smtpav02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 6 Jun 2025 08:48:22 +0000 (GMT) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2025 10:48:17 +0200 Message-Id: To: "Janosch Frank" , Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: S390: Remove sca_lock From: "Christoph Schlameuss" Cc: , "Christian Borntraeger" , "Claudio Imbrenda" , "David Hildenbrand" , "Heiko Carstens" , "Vasily Gorbik" , "Alexander Gordeev" , "Sven Schnelle" X-Mailer: aerc 0.20.1 References: <20250605-rm-sca-lock-v2-1-74922f4f946e@linux.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: NqMDd5RK3UAdUBvWKx34BaZLbDmvWlRE X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: NqMDd5RK3UAdUBvWKx34BaZLbDmvWlRE X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=SO9CVPvH c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=6842ab5b cx=c_pps a=GFwsV6G8L6GxiO2Y/PsHdQ==:117 a=GFwsV6G8L6GxiO2Y/PsHdQ==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=6IFa9wvqVegA:10 a=VwQbUJbxAAAA:8 a=VnNF1IyMAAAA:8 a=UXfCCEaf6KHchlgvdskA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details-Enc: AW1haW4tMjUwNjA2MDA3OCBTYWx0ZWRfX8DbIFDuoHDnw 922qEJzRFJvfCmeisVsmJKff8lPIgu+4CJ28AVO5fiUOA7a3wN2Gzjb/b5nUbKonU5XI9Bu6QGM Vwy77XgstsRKG1QyOr+i8IMVJjv61qk8zx/O32xQBglwSOBOO8tYDzXn7aArKdu0AcO80DPHHx1 r2fY7dN1A9fX2BWbv1WiKxOHVG5O9LtEVF4xZpHb46/tBwIPKfMfLPeLGz2nh5WBifJwpmZZK6k y2mSHNHR87tct3tiLvh1/5aouZn04aPVNg4NuOSvPrdmsU6ofSe+RsgIcirr+r+5VT0LV37ZAn7 z9cfW3alJ4XUosz9S/7CZAS5L/pZI7yMb0iMfTZej0eqltfyOZagcs7gPsWCkpPGuxrmzSUgbgO GYln+BzKjUymtUrDlZ4fGRSipJUusPKrRihJlolh8jFTDB1EQskigURvRcaL1C3znijPZ0D3 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1099,Hydra:6.0.736,FMLib:17.12.80.40 definitions=2025-06-06_02,2025-06-05_01,2025-03-28_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 phishscore=0 priorityscore=1501 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=682 clxscore=1015 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam authscore=0 authtc=n/a authcc= route=outbound adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2505280000 definitions=main-2506060078 On Fri Jun 6, 2025 at 10:14 AM CEST, Janosch Frank wrote: > On 6/5/25 6:14 PM, Christoph Schlameuss wrote: >> Since we are no longer switching from a BSCA to a ESCA we can completely >> get rid of the sca_lock. The write lock was only taken for that >> conversion. >>=20 >> After removal of the lock some local code cleanups are possible. >>=20 >> Signed-off-by: Christoph Schlameuss >> --- >> The patch depends on "KVM: s390: Use ESCA instead of BSCA at VM init" >>=20 >> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250603-rm-bsca-v5-1-f691288ada5c@linux= .ibm.com > > I'm throwing this into the CI. > > If people suggest something, *cough* me for instance *cough*, it doesn't= =20 > hurt to add a suggested-by tag. Noted. Will add that if I have to touch this again. Otherwise I assume we c= an add this in picking?