From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-s390-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71B05C4332F
	for <linux-s390@archiver.kernel.org>; Thu,  3 Nov 2022 23:23:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S231496AbiKCXXE (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-s390@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 3 Nov 2022 19:23:04 -0400
Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51304 "EHLO
        lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S231379AbiKCXXA (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 3 Nov 2022 19:23:00 -0400
Received: from mail.skyhub.de (mail.skyhub.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:190:11c2::b:1457])
        by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4C82205C4;
        Thu,  3 Nov 2022 16:22:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ea9733e72b329c23fffea6a903.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ea:9733:e72b:329c:23ff:fea6:a903])
        (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
        (No client certificate requested)
        by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 2C7531EC04E2;
        Fri,  4 Nov 2022 00:22:43 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim;
        t=1667517763;
        h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
         to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
         content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:  references:references;
        bh=vFXHtgwdW+sR6NHK/2Q+5sMTWyhXvQL1n6tMJLF2xxY=;
        b=BSXGpnI0im++wmsWNxkeuxKjQQej60wIR/Sk0cX2RZ7YrtQNhQA0/JrxGI20wDUweZrCEb
        k+o4bwMt5u5otuBKP/2kTjRja1l1PH+j5LW/iISR7O4Sn/JezDmf47qxabojUHY5r8I2aI
        FToXcyX9TTPeCYGemSLF53/TOlVnQ5I=
Date:   Fri, 4 Nov 2022 00:22:39 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Cc:     x86@kernel.org, linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
        Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>,
        Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi>,
        Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>,
        openrisc@lists.librecores.org,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        "open list:LINUX FOR POWERPC PA SEMI PWRFICIENT" 
        <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
        Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
        Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
        linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] x86: Fix /proc/cpuinfo cpumask warning
Message-ID: <Y2RNP/5Xfs0qS/3X@zn.tnic>
References: <20221031080604.6xei6c4e3ckhsvmy@kamzik>
 <Y1+OUawGJDjh4DOJ@zn.tnic>
 <20221031100327.r7tswmpszvs5ot5n@kamzik>
 <Y2K6clNJBn0SbWU+@zn.tnic>
 <20221103125945.lrr5oxxmylwpam53@kamzik>
 <Y2PX9GfxWYh6+XGT@zn.tnic>
 <20221103153404.uh77nrdkowrxj6cr@kamzik>
 <Y2PsvvOWVs9ZLBsp@yury-laptop>
 <Y2PxAiJ1yNzcUSgs@zn.tnic>
 <Y2P68sfCJMvhKmhj@yury-laptop>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Y2P68sfCJMvhKmhj@yury-laptop>
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-s390.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 10:31:30AM -0700, Yury Norov wrote:
> Let's take for example cpu_llc_shared_mask() added by you in
> arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h recently:
> 
>   static inline struct cpumask *cpu_llc_shared_mask(int cpu)
>   {
>          return per_cpu(cpu_llc_shared_map, cpu);
>   }
> 
> It's in a global header and available to the rest of the kernel, just as
> well.

Just like 

static inline struct cpumask *cpu_l2c_shared_mask(int cpu)
{
        return per_cpu(cpu_l2c_shared_map, cpu);
}

should check != must check. 

But it's perfectly fine if you're going to attempt to prove some bogus
argument of yours - I can safely ignore you.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette