From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:54957 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229715AbhBHNHn (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Feb 2021 08:07:43 -0500 Received: from mail-ot1-f69.google.com ([209.85.210.69]) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l96Fo-0001E1-74 for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 13:07:00 +0000 Received: by mail-ot1-f69.google.com with SMTP id z2so8412697otk.1 for ; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 05:07:00 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 07:06:58 -0600 From: Seth Forshee Subject: Re: [PATCH] tmpfs: Disallow CONFIG_TMPFS_INODE64 on s390 Message-ID: References: <20210205230620.518245-1-seth.forshee@canonical.com> <20210207144831.lsrm74ypbz7i37uz@box> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210207144831.lsrm74ypbz7i37uz@box> List-ID: To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Cc: Andrew Morton , Hugh Dickins , Chris Down , Amir Goldstein , Heiko Carstens , Vasily Gorbik , Christian Borntraeger , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Feb 07, 2021 at 05:48:31PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 05:06:20PM -0600, Seth Forshee wrote: > > This feature requires ino_t be 64-bits, which is true for every > > 64-bit architecture but s390, so prevent this option from being > > selected there. > > Quick grep suggests the same for alpha. Am I wrong? No, it appears you are right. Looks like my grep missed alpha somehow. Andrew, do you prefer an additional patch or an updated version of the previous patch?