Re: [PATCH v8 08/22] s390: vfio-ap: base implementation of VFIO AP device driver

Cornelia Huck
2018-08-09T10:12:03Z

On Wed, 8 Aug 2018 10:44:18 -0400
Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..d7e39ad
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> +/*
> + * VFIO based AP device driver
> + *
> + * Copyright IBM Corp. 2018
> + *
> + * Author(s): Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
> + * Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/string.h>
> +#include "vfio_ap_private.h"
> +
> +#define VFIO_AP_ROOT_NAME "vfio_ap"
> +#define VFIO_AP_DEV_TYPE_NAME "ap_matrix"
> +#define VFIO_AP_DEV_NAME "vfio_ap"
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("IBM Corporation");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("VFIO AP device driver, Copyright IBM Corp. 2018");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> +
> +static struct ap_driver vfio_ap_drv;
> +
> +static struct device_type vfio_ap_dev_type = {
> + .name = VFIO_AP_DEV_TYPE_NAME,
> +};
> +
> +struct ap_matrix_dev matrix_dev = {
> + /*
> + * We may add some fops later to implement a more program friendly
> + * management interface for vfio_ap_mdev devices.
> + */
> + .misc_dev = {
> + MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR,
> + VFIO_AP_DEV_NAME,
> + }

Is there any reason why you embed a struct miscdevice and don't just
use it directly?

> +};
> +
> +/* Only type 10 adapters (CEX4 and later) are supported
> + * by the AP matrix device driver
> + */
> +static struct ap_device_id ap_queue_ids[] = {
> + { .dev_type = AP_DEVICE_TYPE_CEX4,
> + .match_flags = AP_DEVICE_ID_MATCH_QUEUE_TYPE },
> + { .dev_type = AP_DEVICE_TYPE_CEX5,
> + .match_flags = AP_DEVICE_ID_MATCH_QUEUE_TYPE },
> + { .dev_type = AP_DEVICE_TYPE_CEX6,
> + .match_flags = AP_DEVICE_ID_MATCH_QUEUE_TYPE },
> + { /* end of sibling */ },
> +};
> +
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(vfio_ap, ap_queue_ids);
> +
> +static int vfio_ap_queue_dev_probe(struct ap_device *apdev)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void vfio_ap_queue_dev_remove(struct ap_device *apdev)
> +{
> + /* Nothing to do yet */
> +}
> +
> +static int vfio_ap_matrix_dev_create(void)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = misc_register(&matrix_dev.misc_dev);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + to_device(&matrix_dev)->type = &vfio_ap_dev_type;
> + to_device(&matrix_dev)->driver = &vfio_ap_drv.driver;

This looks strange. Why would you want to change the driver for a
miscdevice, and that after it already has been registered? This feels
like a miscdevice is not the right choice here.

> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void vfio_ap_matrix_dev_destroy(void)
> +{
> + misc_deregister(&matrix_dev.misc_dev);
> +}
> +
> +int __init vfio_ap_init(void)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = vfio_ap_matrix_dev_create();
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + memset(&vfio_ap_drv, 0, sizeof(vfio_ap_drv));
> + vfio_ap_drv.probe = vfio_ap_queue_dev_probe;
> + vfio_ap_drv.remove = vfio_ap_queue_dev_remove;
> + vfio_ap_drv.ids = ap_queue_ids;
> +
> + ret = ap_driver_register(&vfio_ap_drv, THIS_MODULE, VFIO_AP_DRV_NAME);
> + if (ret) {
> + vfio_ap_matrix_dev_destroy();
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +void __exit vfio_ap_exit(void)
> +{
> + ap_driver_unregister(&vfio_ap_drv);
> + vfio_ap_matrix_dev_destroy();
> +}
> +
> +module_init(vfio_ap_init);
> +module_exit(vfio_ap_exit);
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..02c878c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +/*
> + * Private data and functions for adjunct processor VFIO matrix driver.
> + *
> + * Copyright IBM Corp. 2018
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef _VFIO_AP_PRIVATE_H_
> +#define _VFIO_AP_PRIVATE_H_
> +
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <linux/miscdevice.h>
> +
> +#include "ap_bus.h"
> +
> +#define VFIO_AP_MODULE_NAME "vfio_ap"
> +#define VFIO_AP_DRV_NAME "vfio_ap"
> +
> +struct ap_matrix_dev {
> + struct miscdevice misc_dev;
> +};
> +
> +extern struct ap_matrix_dev matrix_dev;
> +
> +static inline struct device *to_device(struct ap_matrix_dev *matrix_dev)
> +{
> + return matrix_dev->misc_dev.this_device;
> +}

Even if you keep it as a miscdevice, I don't like that function,
especially the naming. Frankly, I'd simply drop it.

> +
> +#endif /* _VFIO_AP_PRIVATE_H_ */