* [PATCH V4 07/16] s390/perf: Remove driver-specific throttle support
[not found] <20250520181644.2673067-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
@ 2025-05-20 18:16 ` kan.liang
2025-07-23 8:06 ` Sumanth Korikkar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: kan.liang @ 2025-05-20 18:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: peterz, mingo, namhyung, irogers, mark.rutland, linux-kernel,
linux-perf-users
Cc: eranian, ctshao, tmricht, leo.yan, Kan Liang, linux-s390
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
The throttle support has been added in the generic code. Remove
the driver-specific throttle support.
Besides the throttle, perf_event_overflow may return true because of
event_limit. It already does an inatomic event disable. The pmu->stop
is not required either.
Tested-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
---
arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_cf.c | 2 --
arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_sf.c | 5 +----
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_cf.c b/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_cf.c
index e657fad7e376..6a262e198e35 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_cf.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_cf.c
@@ -980,8 +980,6 @@ static int cfdiag_push_sample(struct perf_event *event,
}
overflow = perf_event_overflow(event, &data, ®s);
- if (overflow)
- event->pmu->stop(event, 0);
perf_event_update_userpage(event);
return overflow;
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_sf.c b/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_sf.c
index ad22799d8a7d..91469401f2c9 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_sf.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_sf.c
@@ -1072,10 +1072,7 @@ static int perf_push_sample(struct perf_event *event,
overflow = 0;
if (perf_event_exclude(event, ®s, sde_regs))
goto out;
- if (perf_event_overflow(event, &data, ®s)) {
- overflow = 1;
- event->pmu->stop(event, 0);
- }
+ overflow = perf_event_overflow(event, &data, ®s);
perf_event_update_userpage(event);
out:
return overflow;
--
2.38.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V4 07/16] s390/perf: Remove driver-specific throttle support
2025-05-20 18:16 ` [PATCH V4 07/16] s390/perf: Remove driver-specific throttle support kan.liang
@ 2025-07-23 8:06 ` Sumanth Korikkar
2025-08-06 8:37 ` Sumanth Korikkar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sumanth Korikkar @ 2025-07-23 8:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kan.liang
Cc: peterz, mingo, namhyung, irogers, mark.rutland, linux-kernel,
linux-perf-users, eranian, ctshao, tmricht, leo.yan, linux-s390
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 11:16:35AM -0700, kan.liang@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
>
> The throttle support has been added in the generic code. Remove
> the driver-specific throttle support.
>
> Besides the throttle, perf_event_overflow may return true because of
> event_limit. It already does an inatomic event disable. The pmu->stop
> is not required either.
>
> Tested-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_cf.c | 2 --
> arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_sf.c | 5 +----
> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_cf.c b/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_cf.c
> index e657fad7e376..6a262e198e35 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_cf.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_cf.c
> @@ -980,8 +980,6 @@ static int cfdiag_push_sample(struct perf_event *event,
> }
>
> overflow = perf_event_overflow(event, &data, ®s);
> - if (overflow)
> - event->pmu->stop(event, 0);
>
> perf_event_update_userpage(event);
> return overflow;
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_sf.c b/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_sf.c
> index ad22799d8a7d..91469401f2c9 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_sf.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_sf.c
> @@ -1072,10 +1072,7 @@ static int perf_push_sample(struct perf_event *event,
> overflow = 0;
> if (perf_event_exclude(event, ®s, sde_regs))
> goto out;
> - if (perf_event_overflow(event, &data, ®s)) {
> - overflow = 1;
> - event->pmu->stop(event, 0);
> - }
> + overflow = perf_event_overflow(event, &data, ®s);
> perf_event_update_userpage(event);
> out:
> return overflow;
> --
> 2.38.1
Hi all,
This seems to break POLL_HUP delivery to userspace - when event_limit reaches 0
From perf_event_open man page:
PERF_EVENT_IOC_REFRESH
Non-inherited overflow counters can use this to enable a
counter for a number of overflows specified by the
argument, after which it is disabled. Subsequent calls of
this ioctl add the argument value to the current count. An
overflow notification with POLL_IN set will happen on each
overflow until the count reaches 0; when that happens a
notification with POLL_HUP set is sent and the event is
disabled.
When the event_limit reaches 0, the POLL_HUP signal is expected to be
sent. Prior to this patch, an explicit call to event->stop() was made,
which may have contributed to ensuring that the POLL_HUP signal was
ultimately delivered. However, after this change, I often did not
observe the POLL_HUP signal being delivered as expected in the end
Example program:
output:
Computation result: 49951804672
count.hup: 0 count.pollin: 22
Expected output should be:
count.hup: 1 in the end
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include <time.h>
#include <stdbool.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <poll.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <time.h>
#include <sys/ioctl.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <linux/perf_event.h>
static struct signal_counts {
int in;
int out;
int hup;
int unknown;
} count;
static unsigned long sample_type = PERF_SAMPLE_IP | PERF_SAMPLE_TID |
PERF_SAMPLE_TIME | PERF_SAMPLE_ADDR | PERF_SAMPLE_READ |
PERF_SAMPLE_ID | PERF_SAMPLE_CPU |
PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD | PERF_SAMPLE_STREAM_ID | PERF_SAMPLE_RAW;
static void sighandler(int signum, siginfo_t *info, void *uc)
{
switch(info->si_code) {
case POLL_IN: count.in++; break;
case POLL_OUT: count.out++; break;
case POLL_HUP: count.hup++; break;
default: count.unknown++; break;
}
}
void generate_load(unsigned long long iterations) {
unsigned long long sum = 0;
srand(time(0));
for (unsigned long long i = 0; i < iterations; ++i) {
int rnd = rand();
sum += (rnd ^ (rnd >> 3)) % 1000;
}
printf("Computation result: %llu\n", sum);
}
void perf_attr(struct perf_event_attr *pe,
unsigned long config, unsigned long period, bool freq,
unsigned long bits)
{
memset(pe, 0, sizeof(struct perf_event_attr));
pe->size = sizeof(struct perf_event_attr);
pe->type = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE;
pe->config = PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES;
pe->exclude_kernel = 0;
pe->sample_period = 50000;
pe->freq = 1;
pe->disabled = 1;
pe->config = config;
pe->freq = freq;
pe->sample_type = bits;
}
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
int fd, signo = SIGIO, rc = -1;
struct sigaction sa, sa_old;
struct perf_event_attr pe;
perf_attr(&pe, PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES, 50000, 1, sample_type);
/* Set up overflow handler */
memset(&sa, 0, sizeof(struct sigaction));
memset(&sa_old, 0, sizeof(struct sigaction));
sa.sa_sigaction = sighandler;
sa.sa_flags = SA_SIGINFO;
if (sigaction(signo, &sa, &sa_old) < 0)
goto out;
fd = syscall(__NR_perf_event_open, &pe, 0, -1, -1, 0);
if (fd < 0)
return rc;
rc = fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, O_RDWR | O_NONBLOCK | O_ASYNC);
rc |= fcntl(fd, F_SETSIG, signo);
rc |= fcntl(fd, F_SETOWN, getpid());
if (rc)
goto out;
rc = ioctl(fd, PERF_EVENT_IOC_REFRESH, 2500);
if (rc)
goto out;
generate_load(100000000ULL);
sigaction(signo, &sa_old, NULL);
printf("count.hup: %d count.pollin: %d\n", count.hup, count.in);
close(fd);
return 0;
out:
return rc;
}
Thank you,
Sumanth
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V4 07/16] s390/perf: Remove driver-specific throttle support
2025-07-23 8:06 ` Sumanth Korikkar
@ 2025-08-06 8:37 ` Sumanth Korikkar
2025-08-06 17:05 ` Liang, Kan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sumanth Korikkar @ 2025-08-06 8:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kan.liang
Cc: peterz, mingo, namhyung, irogers, mark.rutland, linux-kernel,
linux-perf-users, eranian, ctshao, tmricht, leo.yan, linux-s390
On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 10:06:26AM +0200, Sumanth Korikkar wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 11:16:35AM -0700, kan.liang@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > The throttle support has been added in the generic code. Remove
> > the driver-specific throttle support.
> >
> > Besides the throttle, perf_event_overflow may return true because of
> > event_limit. It already does an inatomic event disable. The pmu->stop
> > is not required either.
> >
> > Tested-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
> > Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
> > ---
> > arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_cf.c | 2 --
> > arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_sf.c | 5 +----
> > 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_cf.c b/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_cf.c
> > index e657fad7e376..6a262e198e35 100644
> > --- a/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_cf.c
> > +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_cf.c
> > @@ -980,8 +980,6 @@ static int cfdiag_push_sample(struct perf_event *event,
> > }
> >
> > overflow = perf_event_overflow(event, &data, ®s);
> > - if (overflow)
> > - event->pmu->stop(event, 0);
> >
> > perf_event_update_userpage(event);
> > return overflow;
> > diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_sf.c b/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_sf.c
> > index ad22799d8a7d..91469401f2c9 100644
> > --- a/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_sf.c
> > +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_sf.c
> > @@ -1072,10 +1072,7 @@ static int perf_push_sample(struct perf_event *event,
> > overflow = 0;
> > if (perf_event_exclude(event, ®s, sde_regs))
> > goto out;
> > - if (perf_event_overflow(event, &data, ®s)) {
> > - overflow = 1;
> > - event->pmu->stop(event, 0);
> > - }
> > + overflow = perf_event_overflow(event, &data, ®s);
> > perf_event_update_userpage(event);
> > out:
> > return overflow;
> > --
> > 2.38.1
>
> Hi all,
>
> This seems to break POLL_HUP delivery to userspace - when event_limit reaches 0
>
> From perf_event_open man page:
> PERF_EVENT_IOC_REFRESH
> Non-inherited overflow counters can use this to enable a
> counter for a number of overflows specified by the
> argument, after which it is disabled. Subsequent calls of
> this ioctl add the argument value to the current count. An
> overflow notification with POLL_IN set will happen on each
> overflow until the count reaches 0; when that happens a
> notification with POLL_HUP set is sent and the event is
> disabled.
>
> When the event_limit reaches 0, the POLL_HUP signal is expected to be
> sent. Prior to this patch, an explicit call to event->stop() was made,
> which may have contributed to ensuring that the POLL_HUP signal was
> ultimately delivered. However, after this change, I often did not
> observe the POLL_HUP signal being delivered as expected in the end
>
> Example program:
> output:
> Computation result: 49951804672
> count.hup: 0 count.pollin: 22
>
> Expected output should be:
> count.hup: 1 in the end
>
> #define _GNU_SOURCE
> #include <time.h>
> #include <stdbool.h>
> #include <signal.h>
> #include <poll.h>
> #include <fcntl.h>
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <stdlib.h>
> #include <string.h>
> #include <unistd.h>
> #include <time.h>
>
> #include <sys/ioctl.h>
> #include <sys/syscall.h>
> #include <linux/perf_event.h>
>
> static struct signal_counts {
> int in;
> int out;
> int hup;
> int unknown;
> } count;
>
>
> static unsigned long sample_type = PERF_SAMPLE_IP | PERF_SAMPLE_TID |
> PERF_SAMPLE_TIME | PERF_SAMPLE_ADDR | PERF_SAMPLE_READ |
> PERF_SAMPLE_ID | PERF_SAMPLE_CPU |
> PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD | PERF_SAMPLE_STREAM_ID | PERF_SAMPLE_RAW;
>
> static void sighandler(int signum, siginfo_t *info, void *uc)
> {
> switch(info->si_code) {
> case POLL_IN: count.in++; break;
> case POLL_OUT: count.out++; break;
> case POLL_HUP: count.hup++; break;
> default: count.unknown++; break;
> }
> }
>
> void generate_load(unsigned long long iterations) {
> unsigned long long sum = 0;
> srand(time(0));
>
> for (unsigned long long i = 0; i < iterations; ++i) {
> int rnd = rand();
> sum += (rnd ^ (rnd >> 3)) % 1000;
> }
> printf("Computation result: %llu\n", sum);
> }
>
> void perf_attr(struct perf_event_attr *pe,
> unsigned long config, unsigned long period, bool freq,
> unsigned long bits)
> {
> memset(pe, 0, sizeof(struct perf_event_attr));
> pe->size = sizeof(struct perf_event_attr);
> pe->type = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE;
> pe->config = PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES;
> pe->exclude_kernel = 0;
> pe->sample_period = 50000;
> pe->freq = 1;
> pe->disabled = 1;
> pe->config = config;
> pe->freq = freq;
> pe->sample_type = bits;
> }
>
> int main(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> int fd, signo = SIGIO, rc = -1;
> struct sigaction sa, sa_old;
> struct perf_event_attr pe;
>
> perf_attr(&pe, PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES, 50000, 1, sample_type);
> /* Set up overflow handler */
> memset(&sa, 0, sizeof(struct sigaction));
> memset(&sa_old, 0, sizeof(struct sigaction));
> sa.sa_sigaction = sighandler;
> sa.sa_flags = SA_SIGINFO;
> if (sigaction(signo, &sa, &sa_old) < 0)
> goto out;
>
> fd = syscall(__NR_perf_event_open, &pe, 0, -1, -1, 0);
> if (fd < 0)
> return rc;
>
> rc = fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, O_RDWR | O_NONBLOCK | O_ASYNC);
> rc |= fcntl(fd, F_SETSIG, signo);
> rc |= fcntl(fd, F_SETOWN, getpid());
> if (rc)
> goto out;
>
> rc = ioctl(fd, PERF_EVENT_IOC_REFRESH, 2500);
> if (rc)
> goto out;
>
> generate_load(100000000ULL);
> sigaction(signo, &sa_old, NULL);
> printf("count.hup: %d count.pollin: %d\n", count.hup, count.in);
> close(fd);
> return 0;
> out:
> return rc;
> }
Hi Kan,
It would be great if you could share your feedback on this issue.
Thank you.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V4 07/16] s390/perf: Remove driver-specific throttle support
2025-08-06 8:37 ` Sumanth Korikkar
@ 2025-08-06 17:05 ` Liang, Kan
2025-08-11 14:02 ` Sumanth Korikkar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Liang, Kan @ 2025-08-06 17:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sumanth Korikkar
Cc: peterz, mingo, namhyung, irogers, mark.rutland, linux-kernel,
linux-perf-users, eranian, ctshao, tmricht, leo.yan, linux-s390
Hi Sumanth,
Sorry for the late response. I just came back from Sabbatical yesterday.
On 2025-08-06 1:37 a.m., Sumanth Korikkar wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 10:06:26AM +0200, Sumanth Korikkar wrote:
>> On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 11:16:35AM -0700, kan.liang@linux.intel.com wrote:
>>> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
>>>
>>> The throttle support has been added in the generic code. Remove
>>> the driver-specific throttle support.
>>>
>>> Besides the throttle, perf_event_overflow may return true because of
>>> event_limit. It already does an inatomic event disable. The pmu->stop
>>> is not required either.
>>>
>>> Tested-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
>>> Cc: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
>>> Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
>>> ---
>>> arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_cf.c | 2 --
>>> arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_sf.c | 5 +----
>>> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_cf.c b/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_cf.c
>>> index e657fad7e376..6a262e198e35 100644
>>> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_cf.c
>>> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_cf.c
>>> @@ -980,8 +980,6 @@ static int cfdiag_push_sample(struct perf_event *event,
>>> }
>>>
>>> overflow = perf_event_overflow(event, &data, ®s);
>>> - if (overflow)
>>> - event->pmu->stop(event, 0);
>>>
>>> perf_event_update_userpage(event);
>>> return overflow;
>>> diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_sf.c b/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_sf.c
>>> index ad22799d8a7d..91469401f2c9 100644
>>> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_sf.c
>>> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_sf.c
>>> @@ -1072,10 +1072,7 @@ static int perf_push_sample(struct perf_event *event,
>>> overflow = 0;
>>> if (perf_event_exclude(event, ®s, sde_regs))
>>> goto out;
>>> - if (perf_event_overflow(event, &data, ®s)) {
>>> - overflow = 1;
>>> - event->pmu->stop(event, 0);
>>> - }
>>> + overflow = perf_event_overflow(event, &data, ®s);
>>> perf_event_update_userpage(event);
>>> out:
>>> return overflow;
>>> --
>>> 2.38.1
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This seems to break POLL_HUP delivery to userspace - when event_limit reaches 0
>>
>> From perf_event_open man page:
>> PERF_EVENT_IOC_REFRESH
>> Non-inherited overflow counters can use this to enable a
>> counter for a number of overflows specified by the
>> argument, after which it is disabled. Subsequent calls of
>> this ioctl add the argument value to the current count. An
>> overflow notification with POLL_IN set will happen on each
>> overflow until the count reaches 0; when that happens a
>> notification with POLL_HUP set is sent and the event is
>> disabled.
>>
>> When the event_limit reaches 0, the POLL_HUP signal is expected to be
>> sent. Prior to this patch, an explicit call to event->stop() was made,
>> which may have contributed to ensuring that the POLL_HUP signal was
>> ultimately delivered. However, after this change, I often did not
>> observe the POLL_HUP signal being delivered as expected in the end
The event_limit case also returns 1. I missed it when fixing the
throttle issue. :(
I didn't use the IOC_REFRESH before. According to the kernel code, it
reschedules all the events of the event->pmu, when the ioctl is invoked.
So we just need to move the event->pmu->stop() to the generic code as
below. It should keep the behavior unchanged.
Could you please try the below fix?
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 14ae43694833..f492cbcd3bb6 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -10341,6 +10341,7 @@ static int __perf_event_overflow(struct
perf_event *event,
ret = 1;
event->pending_kill = POLL_HUP;
perf_event_disable_inatomic(event);
+ event->pmu->stop(event, 0);
}
if (event->attr.sigtrap) {
Thanks,
Kan
>>
>> Example program:
>> output:
>> Computation result: 49951804672
>> count.hup: 0 count.pollin: 22
>>
>> Expected output should be:
>> count.hup: 1 in the end
>>
>> #define _GNU_SOURCE
>> #include <time.h>
>> #include <stdbool.h>
>> #include <signal.h>
>> #include <poll.h>
>> #include <fcntl.h>
>> #include <stdio.h>
>> #include <stdlib.h>
>> #include <string.h>
>> #include <unistd.h>
>> #include <time.h>
>>
>> #include <sys/ioctl.h>
>> #include <sys/syscall.h>
>> #include <linux/perf_event.h>
>>
>> static struct signal_counts {
>> int in;
>> int out;
>> int hup;
>> int unknown;
>> } count;
>>
>>
>> static unsigned long sample_type = PERF_SAMPLE_IP | PERF_SAMPLE_TID |
>> PERF_SAMPLE_TIME | PERF_SAMPLE_ADDR | PERF_SAMPLE_READ |
>> PERF_SAMPLE_ID | PERF_SAMPLE_CPU |
>> PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD | PERF_SAMPLE_STREAM_ID | PERF_SAMPLE_RAW;
>>
>> static void sighandler(int signum, siginfo_t *info, void *uc)
>> {
>> switch(info->si_code) {
>> case POLL_IN: count.in++; break;
>> case POLL_OUT: count.out++; break;
>> case POLL_HUP: count.hup++; break;
>> default: count.unknown++; break;
>> }
>> }
>>
>> void generate_load(unsigned long long iterations) {
>> unsigned long long sum = 0;
>> srand(time(0));
>>
>> for (unsigned long long i = 0; i < iterations; ++i) {
>> int rnd = rand();
>> sum += (rnd ^ (rnd >> 3)) % 1000;
>> }
>> printf("Computation result: %llu\n", sum);
>> }
>>
>> void perf_attr(struct perf_event_attr *pe,
>> unsigned long config, unsigned long period, bool freq,
>> unsigned long bits)
>> {
>> memset(pe, 0, sizeof(struct perf_event_attr));
>> pe->size = sizeof(struct perf_event_attr);
>> pe->type = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE;
>> pe->config = PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES;
>> pe->exclude_kernel = 0;
>> pe->sample_period = 50000;
>> pe->freq = 1;
>> pe->disabled = 1;
>> pe->config = config;
>> pe->freq = freq;
>> pe->sample_type = bits;
>> }
>>
>> int main(int argc, char **argv)
>> {
>> int fd, signo = SIGIO, rc = -1;
>> struct sigaction sa, sa_old;
>> struct perf_event_attr pe;
>>
>> perf_attr(&pe, PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES, 50000, 1, sample_type);
>> /* Set up overflow handler */
>> memset(&sa, 0, sizeof(struct sigaction));
>> memset(&sa_old, 0, sizeof(struct sigaction));
>> sa.sa_sigaction = sighandler;
>> sa.sa_flags = SA_SIGINFO;
>> if (sigaction(signo, &sa, &sa_old) < 0)
>> goto out;
>>
>> fd = syscall(__NR_perf_event_open, &pe, 0, -1, -1, 0);
>> if (fd < 0)
>> return rc;
>>
>> rc = fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, O_RDWR | O_NONBLOCK | O_ASYNC);
>> rc |= fcntl(fd, F_SETSIG, signo);
>> rc |= fcntl(fd, F_SETOWN, getpid());
>> if (rc)
>> goto out;
>>
>> rc = ioctl(fd, PERF_EVENT_IOC_REFRESH, 2500);
>> if (rc)
>> goto out;
>>
>> generate_load(100000000ULL);
>> sigaction(signo, &sa_old, NULL);
>> printf("count.hup: %d count.pollin: %d\n", count.hup, count.in);
>> close(fd);
>> return 0;
>> out:
>> return rc;
>> }
>
> Hi Kan,
>
> It would be great if you could share your feedback on this issue.
>
> Thank you.
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V4 07/16] s390/perf: Remove driver-specific throttle support
2025-08-06 17:05 ` Liang, Kan
@ 2025-08-11 14:02 ` Sumanth Korikkar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sumanth Korikkar @ 2025-08-11 14:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Liang, Kan
Cc: peterz, mingo, namhyung, irogers, mark.rutland, linux-kernel,
linux-perf-users, eranian, ctshao, tmricht, leo.yan, linux-s390
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> This seems to break POLL_HUP delivery to userspace - when event_limit reaches 0
> >>
> >> From perf_event_open man page:
> >> PERF_EVENT_IOC_REFRESH
> >> Non-inherited overflow counters can use this to enable a
> >> counter for a number of overflows specified by the
> >> argument, after which it is disabled. Subsequent calls of
> >> this ioctl add the argument value to the current count. An
> >> overflow notification with POLL_IN set will happen on each
> >> overflow until the count reaches 0; when that happens a
> >> notification with POLL_HUP set is sent and the event is
> >> disabled.
> >>
> >> When the event_limit reaches 0, the POLL_HUP signal is expected to be
> >> sent. Prior to this patch, an explicit call to event->stop() was made,
> >> which may have contributed to ensuring that the POLL_HUP signal was
> >> ultimately delivered. However, after this change, I often did not
> >> observe the POLL_HUP signal being delivered as expected in the end
>
> The event_limit case also returns 1. I missed it when fixing the
> throttle issue. :(
>
> I didn't use the IOC_REFRESH before. According to the kernel code, it
> reschedules all the events of the event->pmu, when the ioctl is invoked.
> So we just need to move the event->pmu->stop() to the generic code as
> below. It should keep the behavior unchanged.
>
> Could you please try the below fix?
>
> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> index 14ae43694833..f492cbcd3bb6 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> @@ -10341,6 +10341,7 @@ static int __perf_event_overflow(struct
> perf_event *event,
> ret = 1;
> event->pending_kill = POLL_HUP;
> perf_event_disable_inatomic(event);
> + event->pmu->stop(event, 0);
> }
>
> if (event->attr.sigtrap) {
>
> Thanks,
> Kan
Hi Kan,
The above fix works.
Tested-by: Sumanth Korikkar <sumanthk@linux.ibm.com>
Thank you
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-08-11 14:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20250520181644.2673067-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
2025-05-20 18:16 ` [PATCH V4 07/16] s390/perf: Remove driver-specific throttle support kan.liang
2025-07-23 8:06 ` Sumanth Korikkar
2025-08-06 8:37 ` Sumanth Korikkar
2025-08-06 17:05 ` Liang, Kan
2025-08-11 14:02 ` Sumanth Korikkar
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).