From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out30-101.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-101.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFECF255F31; Tue, 9 Sep 2025 11:39:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.101 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757417983; cv=none; b=d2NDyLQ5XpIkONp4+EWHbdymhBfok4IObOYZv5eSaaEP51D6QA4vMoUtevz/984Tb2MSYOy++GXJSfvj+isLAyvAA2f2hU2vyp4Bx6X4Xx4wXFaVswQyjxMSJ/F6nEaK8ocs9KQJO6VF2fSVsrAJeHmcaP2q/lAfZI+FzaKACX8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757417983; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2vPVGLuNg1awR+xeX85MRQK0GwqZk7QK0+n5jfOfVqE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ePqCiaPtXeuMuF3w9juNyDHJQs/TeiU8oRgh0k9iEoGOj1ZStT65pJj5dMeqJqaGbX3w83eug0li6/rfcyMo5k2ByhyuviWZjlfxjAz2G7iLaAvFWluCCl5/syOfweSLtCYLYgVztiAqTO0ikbSjC865a4toQe3hTRIaYozM7tY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b=YE3sGncy; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.101 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b="YE3sGncy" DKIM-Signature:v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.alibaba.com; s=default; t=1757417971; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; bh=2vPVGLuNg1awR+xeX85MRQK0GwqZk7QK0+n5jfOfVqE=; b=YE3sGncysMk0oelbbahQEsjnhlGa/j/ZrnPtW9daUFgKsD9X+B/s17cEJJybsCLxJxOqwHzJfrDKWQ6r/f83IjJjy2Z9qhrqmHO6GGJ1tmR4PGbJo+oSiIFm2lXlnqNr8T5P3tdGHbgdl4RNJRd63GUcGMORT8234a4scZ+UoRo= Received: from localhost(mailfrom:dust.li@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0Wndu0.e_1757417970 cluster:ay36) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Tue, 09 Sep 2025 19:39:30 +0800 Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2025 19:39:30 +0800 From: Dust Li To: Mahanta Jambigi , andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, alibuda@linux.alibaba.com, sidraya@linux.ibm.com, wenjia@linux.ibm.com Cc: pasic@linux.ibm.com, horms@kernel.org, tonylu@linux.alibaba.com, guwen@linux.alibaba.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/smc: Remove unused argument from 2 SMC functions Message-ID: Reply-To: dust.li@linux.alibaba.com References: <20250909071145.2440407-1-mjambigi@linux.ibm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250909071145.2440407-1-mjambigi@linux.ibm.com> On 2025-09-09 09:11:45, Mahanta Jambigi wrote: >The smc argument is not used in both smc_connect_ism_vlan_setup() & >smc_connect_ism_vlan_cleanup(). Hence removing it. > >Fixes: 413498440e30 net/smc: add SMC-D support in af_smc The standard format for the Fixes tag requires the title to be enclosed in parentheses. But I don't think this is a bugfix. >Signed-off-by: Mahanta Jambigi >Reviewed-by: Sidraya Jayagond Besides, Reviewed-by: Dust Li Best regards, Dust