From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1794603588; b=st9fgqs8g0ZX3gOhEyGx+TpC1hTgrnEYu3ZHPP9BQrA62ygGAW0AEkDWTSYno8osae+3 hLsOqNQQqKfXwciiAKVoJM/77JsmyCdT0doqsU28/IsHZShVg/2SCRN3zDr+kKwiUvas9 GqzOihcuH5gaRnE6K6Shf8QhcBscTx0sq5yWkqJqHt0H5bZWkab2BcdlLodpOTC+WUPyQ uR05OCR25YlH1C18wDiGqQ3mkoUvkw0uFRYUboqgb/BVaNNg/6upEPDMSREH4X+EnSP40 qZhkRRjNtzHJxqiKZqLxU3PX5r43bhWZ3s8ls2WgCfPmJAHSDnEnl+j0yy52MrdQBDw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1794603588; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID: References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; bh=gVxBLZX6lQzckB6AIbX2pQJru5dIfjw9YVDcZIdu890=; b=PbmFC0F1Y4QcRP4zFtp9deNZ+q6Uj7DGauz2wcp2hTpy72kR45UtcoUd7CaiGqkhmyJ6 cOubVwwISXG6lx380SmxvVsUXutJBOjlQW4JDgWD4YhvorSCTozSBX9K2roamqpGjl8V7 t+nDJWbBVBBcJOIK+Czo9F+jahVTfHl+e4PkyzUr6quVozeaXEAilt0iXo2dDD6x7Ywd/ Yuryb+elFSwBAofsNYTSo0MmwbMo8YFWwY08/Xf01oVTz+I23u5w+caDBL4FDiWeDkSqW /rBBKRQVgJhFWco3ROg0PtK1x5Y04ONrTTcNpk2HDP1sQwl5bZLHigPcNmPV/uLx1CA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b="EfCt/jkE"; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D88D0606A895; Fri, 13 Nov 2026 20:59:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=EfCt/jkE Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 37F951F000C5; Fri, 13 Nov 2026 20:59:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1794603588; bh=gVxBLZX6lQzckB6AIbX2pQJru5dIfjw9YVDcZIdu890=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=EfCt/jkEInFzOANdOTJJt6IXsNytJX76wHVHRjNrF88Xjw3qp6MqJvxVq0PDoGQid HqvdYMbEdN2obhqGDYDFJojlub4fnNPZJ9U6j8sGvuMtgJAcJYJFKs2Qz44cw4RLcI o3RbslRdMuWZOtId3qgp6zZyQESV4Se91+5ZGEBshlKorXhB8sG6T+/l44w7rZME58 0e/97s29kipqBUVU+icJTEC19aN6eGp44UBq0S/kxYuXWjwxzXQZldSIhlPYj5G+y0 oV0hi0WdohvhJftm39HJNM/uH2AUVFNv4JQ/P5qHhRkj/03UVRKTtC7bn/zMsPkp2q MRBAcCm7m0NGg== Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2026 20:59:41 +0000 From: "Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" To: Carlos =?utf-8?B?TMOzcGV6?= Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, seanjc@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@kernel.org, peterx@redhat.com, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com, Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Alexandre Ghiti Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] KVM: don't zap secondary MMU on permission upgrade Message-ID: References: <20261112142039.907090-2-clopez@suse.de> X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20261112142039.907090-2-clopez@suse.de> Sorry but as I said to David I really question what you're doing with this series on the mm side, and I wonder whether we should even consider it for this cycle, frankly, given [0]. And, myself being the fool who is engaged in the Sisyphean task of converting VMA flags everywhere, you can imagine my delight when I saw that you (seemingly quite knowingly!) chose to abuse that API, writing code that I'll personally have to rewrite later. Don't do that please :) Please also do not keep respinning based on sashiko feedback. FIRST get a clear understanding of what maintainers want. Sashiko is a bug finder, not a reviewer. And see [1]: "Wait for a minimum of one week before resubmitting or pinging reviewers - possibly longer during busy times like merge windows." Please only respin once a week at the minimum. -- Cheers, Lorenzo [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/a2f584f6-e382-4876-aa6d-d5a34de6ee59@kernel.org/ [1]:https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html#don-t-get-discouraged-or-impatient