From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [trivial PATCH] treewide: Convert switch/case fallthrough; to break; From: Joe Perches Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 14:09:32 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20200909205558.GA3384631@dhcp-10-100-145-180.wdl.wdc.com> References: <20200909205558.GA3384631@dhcp-10-100-145-180.wdl.wdc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Keith Busch , Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org Cc: LKML , Jiri Kosina , Kees Cook , Nick Desaulniers On Wed, 2020-09-09 at 13:55 -0700, Keith Busch wrote: > On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 01:06:39PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > diff --git a/crypto/tcrypt.c b/crypto/tcrypt.c > > index eea0f453cfb6..8aac5bc60f4c 100644 > > --- a/crypto/tcrypt.c > > +++ b/crypto/tcrypt.c > > @@ -2464,7 +2464,7 @@ static int do_test(const char *alg, u32 type, u32 mask, int m, u32 num_mb) > > test_hash_speed("streebog512", sec, > > generic_hash_speed_template); > > if (mode > 300 && mode < 400) break; > > - fallthrough; > > + break; > > case 399: > > break; > > Just imho, this change makes the preceding 'if' look even more > pointless. Maybe the fallthrough was a deliberate choice? Not that my > opinion matters here as I don't know this module, but it looked a bit > odd to me. It does look odd to me too. It's also just a test module though so the code isn't particularly crucial. Herbert/David? thoughts?